Snowleopard's 2010 Road Trip

Hi SL, good to hear all your reviews and views, interestingly it seems as though you seem a little disappointed with the general feel of the zoos you have so far visited, would i be right?
well, you certainly have a couple of top 20'ers in the next few days, to look forward to.

Tuesday: North Carolina Zoo
Wednesday: Riverbanks Zoo
Thursday: Tennessee Aquarium (and maybe or maybe not Chattanooga Zoo, but to be honest it is not a high priority and we might skip it)
Friday: Nashville Zoo

2 outstanding elephant exhibits in sight ;)

all the best to the SL family, keep on truckin :D
 
It's really tough to argue against those amazing whale sharks! Plus, they have multiple hammerheads, multiple manta rays, belugas, sea otters, and so much more. Later this year, Georgia will add dolphins (including a show) and then it will be a slam dunk as to who is #1.

You don't need whale sharks, beluga whales, hammerheads, and manta rays to be the best aquarium. I have been to Georgia Aquarium and feel it is more show-like rather than education-like which I feel defines a great aquarium.
 
I can't wait for you to review Nashville. I fell that it's a potentially great zoo that contains zero bad exhibits and one or two excellent ones. The elephant yard is amazing. The landscaping is also just wonderful. Hope you're beating the heat, Snowleopard family! I reccomend iced coffee and lots of gas station slushies.
 
Blackduiker

I'm waiting with great anticipation for the next review from the Snowleopard Family 2010 Road Trip. After reading your review of the Philadelphia Zoo, and the more favorable comparison of that institution over my home Los Angeles Zoo, I'm curious as to your thoughts concerning both zoo's Gorilla habitats now. I know your feelings aren't very favorable towards either one, and do remember one photo comment you made sometime back concerning Campo Reserve in Los Angeles, that "at least it wasn't the soccer field in Philadelphia" or something to that effect. Having now seen both, would you now rank them both equally poorly? And in some future road trip, would you consider revisiting Los Angeles after such exhibits as Elephants of Asia; Reptile, Amphibian, and Insect Interpretive Center; and Rainforest of the Americas are completed? Which hopefully should be by the end of 2012. I also think you might appreciate the mixed exhibit China Pavilion(Francois' Langur/Reeve's Muntjac/Lady Amherst's Pheasant). Though I know past hype of other mega exhibit openings in L.A. have proven disappointing to you and other critics(Red Ape Rainforest/Campo Gorilla Reserve). We LA Zoo lovers kind of stake our future rebirth on the former mentioned habitat openings. But for now and the current 2010 excursion, continue to keep your little crew happy and safe. :)
 
@kiang: I was so excited about the chimpanzee birth before my visit to the North Carolina Zoo, but then disappointed the next day because the chimps were off exhibit. Also, I'm having a blast on this road trip but you are right in that many zoos are not as great as the ones that I saw two years ago. Maybe I shouldn't have loaded up with all the good ones on my first trip!:)

@Blackduiker: The main reason why both Philadelphia and Los Angeles have terrible outdoor yards for their gorillas is because those enclosures are too flat and bare. Gorillas love a canopy over their heads, and even in Woodland Park's lush, jungle-like exhibits they often spend time underneath the covered area and close to visitors. Many zoos gorillas are similar, such as Lincoln Park's apes that rarely go outside into their gorgeous environments. I've loved to see the heavily treed gorilla exhibits at zoos such as North Carolina, Kansas City and to some degree Louisville. Those zoos realize that gorillas don't need "soccer fields" to feel right at home.

DAY 23: Tuesday, August 3rd

Zoo/Aquarium Review # 19: North Carolina Zoo

North Carolina Zoo’s website:

NC Zoo - North Carolina Zoo : Zoo Homepage

Zoo Map:

http://www.nczoo.org/images/Maps/NCZooVisitorGuide.pdf

North Carolina Zoo is a MASSIVE zoo, and with 500 of its more than 1,500 acres developed it is a long day out to tour the enormous grounds. I read a sign stating that it is the “largest walk-through zoo in the world”, although I’m not sure if that is correct or not. There are only two main areas, and both “Africa” and “North America” took just over 3 hours each to tour to make it a 6-hour zoo visit. On top of that there are 5 miles (8 km) of walking trails, and combined with doubling back to see animals on a few occasions and other pathways off of the main trails I calculate that we logged close to 10 km of walking. Whew!

The zoo is so large that the animal exhibits are all enormous in comparison to smaller urban zoos. The “African Plains” enclosure is 40 acres in size and features 9 species, “Prairie” is an 11-acre field for Roosevelt elk and American bison, “Watani Grasslands Reserve” is a brilliant, 7-acre African elephant exhibit, there is a 1-acre Hamadryas baboon enclosure with around 20 of the monkeys, a 0.5 acre gorilla forest, and many other animal habitats that are hugely impressive. At times there were visitors making comments that the zoo was almost too large, as the zoo map states that “major exhibits are about eight minutes apart”. The zoo is not at all like an urban establishment, where at times the animals are within seconds of each other. Here for example we looked in at the grizzly bear exhibit, and then it was probably at least 20 minutes before we hit the black bear exhibit due to the many viewing sites along the massive “Prairie” enclosure. For the most part it is an open-air zoo, with only 3 domed buildings and 3 smaller buildings featuring underwater viewing opportunities.

North Carolina Zoo puts me in a dilemma when it comes to ranking zoos, and of course the question of whether one should even rank zoos in the first place is completely valid. There are many of us here at ZooChat who type out lists of the best zoos and aquariums that we have visited, but such establishments are all so different that it becomes harder to decide on the “best” the more attractions one sees. North Carolina has only African and North American animals, and it does not have the traditional layout of most zoos. The limited continents displayed, as well as the huge walking distances between exhibits, hinders some of the enjoyment of the experience, but at the same time I thoroughly loved this zoo and without a shadow of a doubt it is one of the 10 best I’ve ever seen.

The entire “Africa” zone is outstanding, and there is not a subpar or even average exhibit there whatsoever. Every animal habitat ranges from above average to brilliant. “North America” has perhaps an even more comprehensive collection of animals, but while the area is very impressive there are a number of average exhibits. In the entire zoo I think that about 5% of the enclosures I would classify as poor or substandard, and the level of exhibitry at this zoo is wonderful. I’ll review the two main sections separately so as not to confuse things, and since this is going to be a glowing review simply sit back, enjoy my lengthy written response, and consider booking a ticket to North Carolina!

AFRICA – This area is universally excellent, and there is not a single bad exhibit in the innumerable acres that make up this zone.

Watani Grasslands Reserve – A fairly recent addition (2008) the area devoted to African elephants is slightly over 7 acres, making it the 2nd largest elephant exhibit in all of North America. Only Disney’s Animal Kingdom has more space for its elephants, but those ones can be seen for a grand total of 30 seconds on the safari ride at that park. No wonder I’m not a fan of DAK! In North Carolina I spent what seemed like half an hour walking back and forth between the 4 main viewing points, and the 4 elephants on view interacted with loud, shrieking calls and spent a considerable amount of time digging up red chunks of mud.

The most startling aspect of the exhibit is its lushness, as I suppose having so few elephants on such a vast amount of space has allowed the grass to prosper and remain fresh. In all honesty the huge mammals could perhaps use a couple more mud wallows, as besides the large pool almost the entire area was bright green grass. Now that I spent such a long time gazing at this naturalistic wonderland I am even angrier at having seen the dusty, sandy, barren yards for elephants found at zoos like Cheyenne Mountain, Buffalo and Milwaukee. Those 3 zoos combined did not have a single blade of grass for their elephants and should be ashamed of their desolate wastelands of enclosures, and at North Carolina there are 7 gorgeous acres to roam. I’m not sure if it is the greatest elephant habitat that I’ve ever seen (San Diego Zoo’s Safari Park is maybe in 2nd place for me but I’ve yet to see Dallas or Nashville) but it is still pretty damn impressive. The long-term goal is to complete a huge barn for all the antelope and elephants (construction has begun already) and for the zoo to eventually hold up to 10 African elephants.

African Plains – This 40-acre exhibit is home to at least 7 southern white rhinos (it can contain up to 10 rhinos in the future), ostrich, and these 7 antelope species: greater kudu, Thomson’s gazelle, defassa waterbuck, blesbok, sitatunga, gemsbok and Nile lechwe. There are plenty of viewing opportunities and the amount of space offered to the 9 species is mind-blowing (larger than many entire zoos!) but my main beef with the enormous paddock is that the hoofstock were often too far away to identify let alone see properly. There is a huge lake that is in part of the enclosure, many trees to provide shade, and loads of lush grassland, but the animals were spread out thinly and there needs to be a boardwalk that goes deeper into the territory.

Forest Glade – A massive colony of about 20 Hamadryas baboons, the largest in North America, provides great entertainment in a massive, rocky exhibit that is about an acre in size. They can also be seen indoors in the African Pavilion, and their habitat is outstanding. A nearby gorilla enclosure does not have a lot of climbing opportunities, and it lacks apes (1.2) but the grass is incredibly lush and taller than the gorillas in some areas. The huge apes were very active on my visit, and this entire area is outstanding.

Forest Edge – This is yet another massive enclosure (around 3-4 acres in size) that has giraffes, zebras and ostriches. There are 4 viewing points around the area, including a high deck that is only accessed by paying $2. However, this allows visitors to also feed the giraffes. Some folks on ZooChat praise their local African Savannas, but North Carolina is another great example of an American zoo with multi-acre, brilliant African habitats that blow others out of the water.

Kitera Forest – The apparently huge (almost an acre?) chimpanzee exhibit was unfortunately closed due to the birth of a baby just 24 hours prior to my visit. I saw the outskirts of the enclosure and it appears to be top-notch, and I’ve heard many good things about it in the past. I did read a sign at the zoo that states that the chimp exhibit is one of the largest in North America, and it features the 4th largest troop of chimps in the United States.

Lemur Island – This heavily advertised enclosure used to hold patas monkeys, but they have departed the zoo in favour of ring-tailed and red ruffed lemurs (just added this summer). The island is quite large and nicely planted, and of course children love the leapin’ lemurs from the “Madagascar” films.

African Pavilion – There are zero animals in this area (other than the indoor holding zone for the huge Hamadryas baboon troop) and it is sort of eerie walking around a humid, dense rainforest environment where there are empty exhibits that are overgrown with plants. There used to be a variety of species here (especially primates) but they have all departed for other zoos and according to a docent none of them were kept. Currently it is named “Tropical Plant Pavilion” but the zoo has signs that say they are debating about what to do with the aging structure. The docent told me that the entire African area is pure world-class (which I happen to agree with) and that the zoo felt the weakest exhibits were in the African Pavilion. So out went the animals and now there is arguably not a single poor aspect to the hundred or so acres that make up the African section of the zoo.

Forest Aviary – A small area for Chilean flamingos is outdoors, but inside is a hot, humid, dense jungle with yellow-footed tortoises and over 30 species of free-flying birds. The sheer humidity was intense on my visit (it was already scorching outside) but in this domed building there was no relief from the heat. An interesting and worthy complex that is undoubtedly popular with bird lovers. There is also a small display of poison dart frogs by the entrance.

Lions – Spacious, deep grotto-like area that is not really a grotto at all as there is nothing but lush grass and a deep pool for the pair to rest in.

Red River Hogs – Solid exhibit that is heavily planted and filled with lots of digging areas for the hogs.

NORTH AMERICA - A very comprehensive overview of the North American continent, with animals from the Arctic, Coast, Grasslands, Prairies, Woodlands, Swamp, Marsh and Desert. Not quite as overwhelmingly superb as the African section of the zoo, but incredibly larger in walking trails and the variety of animals displayed.

Sonora Desert – This was perhaps my favourite section of North America, as this large domed building features innovative exhibits and is brilliantly planted both indoors and along the visitor pathway outside. The first exhibit is for these species: Anna’s hummingbird, verdin and lesser goldfinch, with a gopher snake in a separate burrow set into the rockwork. A greater roadrunner/gila woodpecker/Gambel’s quail enclosure is nicely designed, and a desert tortoise/desert iguana/blue spiny lizard/crevice lizard open-topped area was also above average. Free-flying birds such as black-chinned hummingbirds, Gambel’s quails, Inca doves, house finches, white-winged doves and horned larks were all over the place, and a so-so ocelot enclosure was built alongside part of the wall. An Isla San Esteban chuckwalla/desert box turtle exhibit is excellent, and there are loads more terrariums that are quite cleverly built into the rockwork alongside the visitor pathways. A nocturnal area features skunks, coatis, vampire bats and ringtails, amongst smaller desert dwellers.

Streamside – River otters in an excellent, narrow habitat with underwater viewing, a decent bobcat exhibit, and then 2 buildings containing all sorts of reptiles, amphibians and fish. This whole area is attractively designed, and there are at least 8 species of snake within several huge mixed-species terrariums.

“Prairie” – A massive, 11-acre field roamed by bison and elk. There are 4 viewing areas to this monstrously-sized enclosure, and in 2009 the zoo added “The Geyser”. This is an enjoyable spot next to a viewing area of the bison/elk where 4 small geysers and 1 large geyser erupt into the air with bursts of water every 5 minutes during the summer. A well-designed addition that is a little gimmicky but led to a discussion about Yellowstone National Park between several onlookers.

Rocky Coast – A polar bear exhibit that was better than I was expecting, as the zoo plans to renovate/overhaul/expand that area. I suppose that this zoo has high standards! The underwater viewing here is terrific, but there was only one sleeping bruin on display during our visit. Nearby is a small bald eagle aviary (it used to house peregrine falcons), an average pinniped pool (the standard harbor seal/California sea lion mix), a spacious Arctic fox enclosure (a hundred times better than the crappy cage for this species at Maryland Zoo) and a fantastic indoor “Alaskan Seabirds” exhibit with ice-cold temperatures for horned puffins, thick-billed murres and parakeet auklets. The active birds have a large cliff in which to dive down into the undoubtedly frigid water.

Cypress Swamp – There is an average-sized and lush cougar enclosure featuring a couple of cats, and a massive alligator exhibit that allows visitors to get scarily close to the creatures in their swampy home. There is a second alligator exhibit farther down the loop (also with alligator snapping turtles in that pond) as well as several smaller terrariums for various turtles, snakes and frogs.

Woodlands – Black bears have a heavily forested area that is actually rather large for such a small bear species. One of the highlights of the zoo visit was watching a bear amble over to the rocky section near the viewing platform, and then proceed to walk down to the water and attempt to catch all of the wild frogs that were hopping madly out of the reach of its claws. After exhausting itself the bear actually took a swim back and forth before getting out, shaking itself off, and heading back into the forest.

In this same area are average but still decent grizzly bear and red wolf enclosures, although the grizzlies were off exhibit due to maintenance on their boulder-strewn habitat.

Honey Bee Garden – This new addition (2009) is very intriguing and the only animal species is a large hive full of bees. But for kids it is terrific, with all sorts of informative, eye-catching literature on bees, a giant hive that offers up a photo opportunity for families, and even an enormous bee surrounded by a wooden boardwalk that takes visitors through all sorts of informative placards on the species.

Marsh – There are no captive animals in this area, but by wandering down to a newly constructed boardwalk a visitor can easily see large frogs in the bog and apparently there is quite the variety of bird life in the huge lake that is within the zoo’s grounds.

OVERALL:

North Carolina Zoo is almost like a combination of the best of San Diego Zoo and the best of San Diego Zoo’s Safari Park. There are no trains or monorails to see the animals, which I adore as I don’t ever enjoy taking any kind of rides at zoos. I’d much rather stroll at my leisure around the zoo, and if I want to take 10 seconds or 10 minutes viewing a particular exhibit then I can do so at my pleasure. North Carolina offers its animals vast areas to roam, and there is also potential for even greater expansions in the future. With 500 acres developed and at least another 1,000 surrounding the grounds this zoo has the potential to be a true zoological masterpiece.

I think that this is one zoo that will definitely appeal to some zoo fans more than others. In terms of space allocated to the animals then this is perhaps the #1 walk-through zoo on the planet, but obviously with only two continents displayed there is a lack of diversity within the gargantuan grounds. The long walks between animal habitats, and the number of lush exhibits means that not all of the creatures can be visible on every single visit. Personally I loved this zoo and I will surely be pondering its qualities all summer long. It is the 3rd truly great American zoo that I have seen this summer (after Sedgwick County and Saint Louis) but it lacks the traditional buildings and structures of most of the zoos of the world. Maybe that is a good thing, as there is loads of space for both visitors and captive animals.

There are plans afoot to expand the polar bear exhibit, but the real intriguing idea is the feasibility study (costing something like $90,000) that will be done on whether or not to add an Asian zone to the zoo. If another huge area is added to the zoo, and assuming that it is like Africa and North America and takes about 3 hours to tour, then this zoo could well become a 2-day attraction and be a legitimate challenger to also become the best zoo in North America. I can’t imagine how much walking there would be with a 3rd continent added!
 
There are plans afoot to expand the polar bear exhibit, but the real intriguing idea is the feasibility study (costing something like $90,000) that will be done on whether or not to add an Asian zone to the zoo. If another huge area is added to the zoo, and assuming that it is like Africa and North America and takes about 3 hours to tour, then this zoo could well become a 2-day attraction and be a legitimate challenger to also become the best zoo in North America. I can’t imagine how much walking there would be with a 3rd continent added!

A few notes: I love the addition of "The Geyser", and the Marsh often has wild beavers that you can see. I'm surprised that the African Pavilion is still standing as, over 2 years ago, I was told it would soon be torn down. Back in it heyday, this Pavilion was one of the best exhibits in the Zoo, with a nearly unbelievable variety of African animals inside -- colobus monkeys, mandrills, spot-necked otters, crocodiles, meerkats, cichlid fish, porcupines, foxes, caracals, servals, and lots of birds!

Back when I wrote my first book (in 1994), this Zoo had plans to, every 5 years or so, open another continental section comparable to Africa and North America. They would have equally-great sections for Asia, Australia, South America, and even Europe! Based on these plans, I called this Zoo, "The 21st Century's Best Zoo". They used my tagline in their advertising for over 10 years! But alas, the financial realities of running and building a Zoo caught up with them, and thus their ambitious plans had to be cancelled -- or delayed. Thus, I'm delighted to hear from SnowLeopard that they are finally considering adding an Asia section.
 
There are no trains or monorails to see the animals, which I adore as I don’t ever enjoy taking any kind of rides at zoos.

Oops, JBNBSN99 has a good point! First, your "dislike" is merely a matter of personal taste, and your view is clearly in the minority among typical zoo visitors. Train rides are very popular among children, and I'm betting your Kylie will enjoy riding the "choo choos" in just a few years. Even more so, however, I don't know how you can dislike the monorail rides! They are quiet, peaceful, and sometimes offer a great tour of the animal habitats. How many of the monorail rides have you ridden, SnowLeopard? Perhaps you're basing your opinion on the Bronx Zoo's monorail -- which has some major problems, with poor viewing of the animals. Miami's monorail is more or less basic transportation. But the monorail tours at Minnesota and especially at JBNBSN99's Dallas are spectacular tours! I'll be very interested to hear if you change your mind a little after riding with JBNBSN99 in Dallas.
 
I will be surprised if you dislike the monorail tour at Dallas, snowleopard. That is the only monorail tour I have been on that I really enjoyed. I do wish visitors could stay at the river exhibit longer though, especially if they add more animals to it. That is really my only complaint about the DZ monorail.
 
What a coincidence, the Sonoran Desert is my favorite part of North America too (and I haven't even been to North Carolina Zoo) :D:D:D

And I would put the Arizona Sonora Desert Museum in the top few zoos I have visited.

Speaking of which, are there any desert exhibits at zoos that aren't good? It seems every one mentioned on here is at least above average quality.
 
Yes, the Bronx monorail is quite poor considering how quickly it passes the animal along with some poor viewing opportunities. It's more frustrating too due to it containing some of the most popular zoo animals.

However, the SDWAP monorail is quite good, although not as good as it was. And I enjoyed the sky tram at the SDZ since it gave me a new perspective on it.

In general, I, like Snowleopard, do greatly prefer to walk around though. I never even went on the bus at SDZ for example.
 
Another zoo to add to my list. Oh for the life of a teacher to have the full summer off. Oh well, I could be retiring within the next couple of years, then it's zoo travel time! On to the next Snowleopard review.
 
A brief note as far as rides are concerned: rides SUCK for viewing animals, which is the #1 reason why anyone goes to a zoo. Disney's "Kilimanjaro Safari" ride allows visitors to see the mandrill troop for less than 10 seconds, and the elephants for about 30-45 seconds. Those are not exaggerations. At the North Carolina Zoo a couple of days ago I watched the elephants for a long, long time and if I only had 30 seconds to see them it would have been a crying shame. At the Bronx Zoo I passed tigers, red pandas elephants and extremely rare hoofstock in seconds and didn't really get good looks at any of the animals. Again, rides SUCK for animal viewing opportunities and my wife and I would both much rather walk than take any kind of ride. Also, on this road trip at the Binder Park Zoo, Kansas City Zoo and Maryland Zoo there are trams escorting visitors to certain areas of the grounds, and we took lengthy walks at all 3 of those zoos. Loading the 30-pound stroller and 20-pound wriggling baby onto our single ride (the Binder Park tram going one-way) was so awkward that we abandoned that idea and walked all the way back from their isolated African zone. Strollers have to be folded up into one small area, and so all of our numerous bags, backpacks, cameras, drinks, etc have to be piled up or somehow carried on our bodies. It was a nightmare!

To those that love rides, I bet you don't have small babies with you when you visit zoos. When Kylie gets older I can re-evaluate rides and I'll probably succumb to a desire to go on them, but at the moment they are moving nightmares. Even the 12-minute train ride at my local Greater Vancouver Zoo, which I just went on for only the 3rd time ever (even though we visit that zoo all the time and can ride the train for free due to our membership) Kylie was great for 7 minutes and then the last 5 minutes was another nightmare as she struggled against my arms as she was overally excited to crawl right onto the tracks! Again, for me personally rides are a waste of time with seeing animals and a waste of time with a young baby. Neither my wife Debbie or I even have any urges whatsoever to visit giant rollercoasters and other attractions at Disney, as why go on something that you have to wait in line for an hour to ride and then end up with a sick stomach?

DAY 24: Wednesday, August 4th

Zoo/Aquarium Review # 20: Riverbanks Zoo & Garden

Riverbanks Zoo’s website:

Riverbanks Zoo and Garden

Zoo Map:

http://www.riverbanks.org/planvisit/assets/files/parkmap.pdf

Riverbanks Zoo & Garden is a 170-acre zoo in South Carolina that contains a 70-acre botanical garden that can be entered either separately or through the zoo itself as it is included in the single admission price. We skipped the garden section altogether, as it did not really interest us due to our tight timeframe, it contains no animal exhibits, and we had 5 hours of driving to do directly after the zoo. I have read online that it is supposedly one of the best gardens to be found anywhere in the United States, but I won’t include it in my review.

The zoo was much smaller than I had anticipated, even with discussing it briefly with a couple of fellow zoo fans. After the enormous North Carolina Zoo the previous day, with its 10 km of walking, it was a bit of a shock to spend 2.5 hours at Riverbanks and be ready to leave. But by skipping the non-animal area of the gardens, and simply walking by things like the pony rides, family farm, wildlife classroom, climbing wall, playground and mini-train station then not a great deal of animal exhibits are left to see. The zoo claims to have over 2,000 animals of more than 350 species, but the “ARC – Aquarium/Reptile Complex” probably accounts for much more than half of that total.

The visit was highlighted by the engaging performance of the zoo’s two fishing cats, as for the first time ever I saw them actually fishing! There have been a lot of zoos in my lifetime that have contained fishing cats, and usually they are next to impossible to locate in densely planted exhibits or else they are perched upon a rocky ledge sleeping. Here the two cats actively caught and ate two fish each and my family and I stood there transfixed for about 10 minutes checking out the cool behavior of the exotic cats. It was similar to the day before, when an American black bear hunted for frogs and swam back and forth in its pool directly in front of us. Those tiny moments are what continue to make zoos special.

THE BEST:

Ndoki Forest – This African section contains the most densely planted gorilla exhibit I’ve ever seen, and there are enormous viewing windows and a large viewing area outdoors. However, the vegetation is so thick that it is ridiculously difficult to actually spot an ape, and judging from signs the zoo only has two males. They need more gorillas to add to what has the potential to become yet another great American gorilla habitat, because as it stands right now one would be better off finding a needle in a zoological haystack.

One excellent exhibit is an African bird area across from the elephants, as Abyssinian ground hornbills, cinerous vultures and East African crowned cranes intermingle across a large area packed with a pool, a sandy zone, deep grasses and a safari jeep! There is a good meerkat exhibit that is situated directly in front of an African elephant enclosure, which is about half an acre in size and full of red, sandy soil. The 4 elephants that I saw were all rather active and busy foraging through their hay for treats, but after seeing the lush, green, 7-acre African elephant masterpiece at the North Carolina Zoo the day before I realize that the South Carolina elephants have received the wrong end of the deal.

THE AVERAGE:

African Plains – This area has two large exhibits: zebras and ostriches in a rather bare yard, and reticulated giraffes (complete with the now obligatory feeding station) in a huge, well-shaded enclosure. These two enclosures are decent, but nothing that would warrant me placing them in my “best” category.

Aquarium/Reptile Complex – The reptile displays here are excellent, and include creatures from all over the world. There are some fantastic species on exhibit, and here is only a partial list of some of the highlights: false gharial (at least 3 of them), Grand Cayman blue iguana, frilled lizard, Gould’s montior (Aussie goanna), various poison dart frogs, gila monster, Boelen’s python, king cobra, red spitting cobra, dwarf caiman, green anaconda, reticulate python, matamata, hellbender, probably at least 5 different species of rattlesnakes (eastern diamondback, aruba island, timber, etc), copperhead, green mamba, eastern coppermouth, alligator snapping turtle, shingleback skink and puff adder. Elsewhere in the zoo there is a spacious yard for Galapagos tortoises and a large swamp for American alligators.

The aquarium side of the building is much smaller and relatively disappointing, which is in sharp contrast with the fairly impressive reptile/amphibian half. The 55,000 gallon Pacific Coral Reef tank and nearby Caribbean coral reef tank are both beautiful, but none of the much smaller tanks are that interesting. A massive Japanese spider crab has a tank that allows it to move about two feet in either direction, and there were dirty tanks that needed a good scrub. Also, two empty exhibits made a bad impression of the general maintenance of the area. Overall this building is a “Jekyll & Hyde” mixture of great and subpar. Maybe other than the two largest aquarium tanks the entire area should be turned over to reptiles and amphibians?

Riverbanks Conservation Outpost – Traveling from the indoor gorilla viewing building to the outdoor area all visitors stroll through a tunnel that is lined with numerous animal exhibits. Some of the enclosures are terrific and packed with natural substrate, while others are too small for their occupants. Here is a list of all the species found in this part of the zoo: Matschie’s tree kangaroo, fishing cat, Rodrigues fruit bat, white-faced saki monkey, black howler monkey, lion-tailed macaque, golden lion tamarin, golden-headed lion tamarin, Hoffman’s two-toed sloth, crocodile monitor (missing almost all of its tail!) and black-footed cat.

Bird House – A Caribbean flamingo pool is outside, and indoors the building is divided into 3 sections. “Penguin Coast” is home to king, gentoo and rockhopper penguins; “Asian Trek” has a nicely themed décor that comes with bamboo poles at the entrance; and “Savanna Camp” thrusts the spotlight on African and South American avian wonders. This whole area is not very large, but quite tastefully designed.

Primate Islands – Ring-tailed and red ruffed lemurs share a tiny island with a single large tree, while elsewhere in the zoo there is a pair of traditional, mock-rock blobs that both contain hootin’ and hollerin’ siamangs.

Koala Knockabout – On my visit two koalas were of course fast asleep on trees indoors, while the outdoor yard was devoid of cuddly Aussie cuties. Some parma wallabies hopped around in a well-planted enclosure, while some small tree boas and a frilled lizard were in terrariums near the slumbering koalas. Outside was the typical walk-through lorikeet aviary, with countless screaming kids and pooping birds.

THE WORST:

Grottoes – There are 5 grottoes/pits at the zoo, containing these mammals: grizzly bears, spotted hyenas, Hamadryas baboons, lions and Amur tigers. Within the lion and hyena grottoes, and separated via strings of hotwire and a moat, are painfully small grottoes for black-handed spider monkeys and Diana monkeys. These poor bastards have nothing but baking mockrock to exist on, and I’d love to be able to have access to the enclosures with a tape measure just to see how truly small the areas are. Sad, sad, sad. Of course all of the animals were lying around looking obese and bloated, which is par for the course in zoos with small grottoes. Once again I thought back to the previous day’s visit to the wonderful North Carolina Zoo, as there the Hamadryas baboon troop (20 individuals) has an exhibit that is about a full acre in size!

Kangaroo Walkabout – This small walk-through area had 2 red kangaroos and 2 wallabies on my visit, and far too many humans for such a tiny pathway. In comparison to the terrific walk-through marsupial zones at the Fort Wayne and Kansas City zoos this one was terribly disappointing and yet brand new this year!

OVERALL:

Riverbanks Zoo is a worthwhile zoological diversion, but I would definitely not urge anyone to drive hundreds of kilometers out of their way in order to tour its grounds. In the past two years it has demolished exhibits for Nile hippos, warthogs and sea lions, but the additions of kangaroos and various birds have not added much to the zoo. If more gorillas were acquired then the Ndoki Forest zone could be fantastic, and the same goes for a fresh lick of paint on the ARC complex, but at least there aren’t that many badly antiquated animal habitats. Other than the 5 tiny grottoes there isn’t anything terrible at the zoo, and it is a fairly small establishment (in terms of major animal exhibits) that can be seen in just a few hours.
 
A brief note as far as rides are concerned: rides SUCK for viewing animals, which is the #1 reason why anyone goes to a zoo. Disney's "Kilimanjaro Safari" ride allows visitors to see the mandrill troop for less than 10 seconds, and the elephants for about 30-45 seconds. Those are not exaggerations. At the North Carolina Zoo a couple of days ago I watched the elephants for a long, long time and if I only had 30 seconds to see them it would have been a crying shame. At the Bronx Zoo I passed tigers, red pandas elephants and extremely rare hoofstock in seconds and didn't really get good looks at any of the animals. Again, rides SUCK for animal viewing opportunities and my wife and I would both much rather walk than take any kind of ride. Also, on this road trip at the Binder Park Zoo, Kansas City Zoo and Maryland Zoo there are trams escorting visitors to certain areas of the grounds, and we took lengthy walks at all 3 of those zoos. Loading the 30-pound stroller and 20-pound wriggling baby onto our single ride (the Binder Park tram going one-way) was so awkward that we abandoned that idea and walked all the way back from their isolated African zone. Strollers have to be folded up into one small area, and so all of our numerous bags, backpacks, cameras, drinks, etc have to be piled up or somehow carried on our bodies. It was a nightmare!

I share Snowleopard's view here for the most part.

I have a mixed feeling about trains and trams as they don't allow you to enjoy observing the animals. You might as well put a tape or disc with a wildlife show on back home, hit 'Play' and then 'Fast forward'. Why not? Saves you the money it costs to visit a zoo! :rolleyes:

I see one positive side though: a tram ride can help you to 'scan' the zoo. You enter the zoo, take the tram close by, sit in it 20 minutes or so to get the overall idea of the place. Personally though I like to do my scanning on foot and follow it with a second or third round to fully appreciate the zoo.

Trains and trams being the only way to see animals in most safari parks is the reason why I almost try to avoid them, or at least will not go to great trouble to visit them (I'm usually without a car so have to limit myself to metropolitan zoos due to accessibility in any case).

The famous Beekse Bergen Safari Park in the Netherlands made changes a few years ago by adding miles and miles of track so that probably 90 percent of the park can be seen on foot now. The remaining 10 percent you must see on the zoo tram, which nevertheless has stops to let you watch and photograph. Before I think they allowed cars. A good move.

I still look with sadness at the only photo I have of the Northern White Rhinoceroses at the SDWAP. On one hand I'm glad and grateful that I got to see this rare species, but I'm also sad and annoyed that the sight only lasted for a few seconds from the WGASA railway, and those few second were really used to take the sole photo (I didn't want to leave the park without a photo of their rarest creature so this was my sacrifice I guess).

As to Dallas Zoo and most other metropolitan zoos (bar the Bronx) I think all that can be seen from the tram can be seen on foot too. I look forward to go on the Dallas tram with my fellow Zoochatter, and if necessary I'll go several times on the Bronx monorail so that I can get both good photos and enjoy the animals (even if it is $3 or so each time)
 
Do you ever look at a zoo for what it IS, not what it ISN'T? You might be able to enjoy life more if you followed this principle.
 
A brief note as far as rides are concerned: rides SUCK for viewing animals, which is the #1 reason why anyone goes to a zoo. Disney's "Kilimanjaro Safari" ride allows visitors to see the mandrill troop for less than 10 seconds, and the elephants for about 30-45 seconds. Those are not exaggerations.

To each his own. While again I consider SnowLeopard a personal friend, and I'm really enjoying all of his reviews, he and I clearly differ on this opinion. In America's Best Zoos, I named Disney's Kilimanjaro Safari (which SL repeatedly pans) my #1 rated zoo exhibit in the nation. I've been to Disney World 4 times in the past 5 years, and every time I go I ride Kilimanjaro at least twice. Every time I do, I feel even stronger about my #1 rating. Why? Because it is literally the most realistic re-creation of an African safari on this side of the Atlantic. Period. I am sympathetic to SL's desire to spend more time watching the animals, and I'm sure most ZooChat zoo fanatics (which most of us are) agree with him on this. But honestly, the majority of visitors to Disney's Animal Kingdom (DAK) are not typical zoo visitors, and they are not there "just to see the animals". They are there for an "adventure", and Kilimanjaro clearly gives them that. The beauty of Kilimanjaro (and all of DAK) is that, while it's not a typical zoo, it gives non-regular zoo visitors such a great experience with animals that it whets their appetite to go see zoo animals again -- probably at their own local zoo.

SnowLeopard (and others) have suggested that Kilimanjaro would be so much better if they just built a walking trail for visitors to see the animals seen on the safari jeep ride. But think of it -- if, while on the ride, you saw a long stream of people in the background behind the animals, wouldn't that take away from the realism of the re-created African safari? I think it would. The only possible solution I can think of would be to do what Busch Gardens has done with their also very realistic Serengeti Plain exhibit. While the main way to see all of the animals of Busch's massive savanna yard is via a slow-moving train, they also offer a very high sky ride to give you another way to see the animals. Perhaps if Disney did this (and the sky ride was high enough), it might not diminish the realism of Kilimanjaro.

Final word on Kilimanjaro & our book (America's Best Zoos): If you look at the photo of the ride in the book on page 61: that's my daughter, and I'm very proud of her!
 
@Baldur - you cannot see the Dallas monorail exhibits by walking - there is no walking trail to that part of the zoo. I wish there was, because the one time I was there the monorail was closed for the winter (even though it was sunny and 70 degrees Farenheit on a weekend!). I believe they now run the monorail year round, but I would still like a walking trail too, so I could stay longer and take pictures.

I enjoy rides, but I also like to linger like Snowleopard. As long as they provide both (ie a walking trail along with the ride), then what is the harm? If you would rather walk, then go ahead - no one says you have to take the ride. Only problem is when that is the only way to view, such as DAK, Dallas, Bronx.

Some zoo trams or buses (not trains or monorails) are a problem because they use the same roads the walking public uses and people have to get out of the way when the tram goes by. This is a real problem at San Diego and Los Angeles.

@ANyhuis - DAK Kilminjaro would be a million times better with a walking trail (or even a simple lookout) and it would not have to intrude with riders views. Just put it on the edge looking into the savanna, like at Busch Gardens.
 
Back
Top