Snowleopard's 2019 Road Trip: Netherlands, Belgium, France & Germany

So much to respond to and hopefully I don't miss anyone.

First of all, kudos to @Maguari for consistently replying in a positive manner, even when you disagree with some of the things that I've said. That makes for a great forum and healthy debate is a fascination for all of us. I think that you've seen all of the big German zoos that I've been visiting, but have you visited every German zoo that I've been to so far?

@DavidBrown the Kea exhibit that goes from one aviary and under a weird boardwalk to another aviary is at De Paay Zoo in the Netherlands...probably a strong contender for one of the Top 5 all-time worst zoos I've seen in my lifetime. The stench, the peeling signs, the utter disregard for cleanliness...shocking and I'm really surprised that the place hasn't been shut down. I will have to think how harsh I want that review to go, but it was an awful zoo in so many ways even with its rarities.

@Batto , your comment about the charging for zoo maps had me chuckling out loud. The audacity indeed! On my North American trips I would always grab 5 or 6 zoo maps so that I could use one to crinkle and analyze around the zoo, another for my collection at home of almost 2,000 good-conditioned ones, and then several more to trade with folks on this forum. @Arek , @sooty mangabey and @devilfish , to name just three. Sorry folks, but I have been only buying two maps (both for myself) as I don't like the idea of buying 5 or 6 maps at each zoo when 95% of all the zoos I've ever visited have had free maps. It would be bloody expensive. At least there are some guidebooks over here in Europe and far more than the paltry few that are located in North America.

As for the Tour de France, @Arizona Docent , I would rather skip that event. I've seen enough cyclists here to last a lifetime, including some groups in the Dutch countryside with 5 guys all dressed in identical blue outfits (like speedy Smurfs) or another group had all yellow-and-black tights on as they raced down the street and I thought it was a swarm of wasps!

@TeaLovingDave Thanks for the massive list of species, with Latin names, that you posted on this thread from the Aquazoo Lobbecke Museum. That must have taken a heck of a long time to type out...but thanks anyway as I really enjoyed that place and I'm glad that it was my 100th aquarium. It was a slight upgrade on a typical Sea Life. :p

@Arek Please keep the intriguing historical zoo facts coming as I love reading about them. You mentioned the 'Red-tailed Moustached Monkeys' at Gelsenkirchen and how that zoo is one of only three on the continent to have them. That's a fact that I love learning about. Cheers...and I'm so glad that I spent time watching such a rare species.

@vogelcommando It was great meeting up with you and you'll appear in this thread again when I get around to typing it up. Thanks for the Corsac Fox memories!

@lintworm Thanks for your input at several junctures in this thread. I prefer the Planckendael, Gelsenkirchen and GaiaZOO type of zoos but I also like the same zoos that you prefer (Artis, Cologne, Antwerp) ...just not as much as you do. ;) One thing for certain, whether we all like it or not, it would seem that most zoos are not building the massive animal houses any longer and the zoos of the future are slightly more modern and naturalistic like the Planckendaels of the world. Having said that, I saw the 'Pandasia' complex at Ouwehands Zoo and that is one enormous set of structures. I didn't really like the zoo in Rhenen, but that Giant Panda building is a memorable addition to a popular zoo.

I cannot forget about @Bib Fortuna whom I've heard is an interesting guy from those that have met him via his 3 or 4 different aliases on ZooChat over the years or even at ZooHistorica each September. I think that you and I would have more in common in regards to zoos than you might initially think. I loved Frankfurt and also strongly dislike Tropic World at Brookfield Zoo, although you lumping it to together with JungleWorld in the Bronx is a bit harsh. Don't worry, I have thrown a lot of criticism at North American zoos over the years and you can always re-read old threads for the proof. Maybe it's because I'm over in Europe right now on a daily basis, but there is part of me that thinks maybe the European zoos are truly better overall. It's a tough call, and also a regional thing, as the zoos of certain unnamed nations in Europe won't register too highly while the zoos in the nations that I'm visiting are mainly impressive.

I've had a few emails and messages about the differences between Europe and America in terms of zoos (let's fact it, the U.S. dominates North America for zoos) and that's why I've been mentioning a few things here and there.

Europe 'wins' for elephant houses, giraffe houses and antelope houses because they are often large structures and the public can enter into most of them. Primate outdoor exhibits, especially the walk-through yards everywhere, is a clear bonus for European zoos. European zoos win for historic architecture, ornate design and historical value. Another win is birds of prey, plus the halting of pinioning birds in savanna enclosures. Europe might have better quality in terms of reptile terrariums, with fairly large sizes the norm. Europe wins for small animals like bats, rats and mice.

North America 'wins' in a big way for amenities. Whether it is gift shops, drinking fountains everywhere, free parking at many places, countless free zoo maps, free washrooms, etc.. Those are all extremely important aspects of a zoo visit. North America probably has far greater reptile collections in terms of quantity of species, and I'm not even talking about venomous snakes but a collection overall. Elephant exhibits are larger in the U.S., with much more space, as the zoos do tend to be larger than their Euro counterparts. The U.S. wins for pinnipeds.

It seems to me that big cats are fairly even, with the same going for bears. I think that North America might have more underwater viewing options for polar bears, grizzlies bears, tigers, penguins, etc., although that could be just anecdotal. One thing that I've noticed is that a LOT of the underwater viewing in Europe sees the water all green and it is something that then makes underwater viewing a mute point. I saw a Pygmy Hippo dive into a pool at GaiaZOO and I might as well have been looking at a wall painted green. I would say that 75% of all the underwater viewing has been very poor in Europe. In the U.S. all of the pools are crystal clear, which I wonder whether is actually better for the animals or not? My gut feeling is that the untreated, perhaps chlorine-free water in the European pools is better for the skin and eyes of the animals, with the viewing conditions in the U.S. better for visitors. I'm just guessing there...

Anyway, I could go on all day long and at the end of the day there's not much to choose between the two continents in terms of zoos. There are a lot of differences and so it's a nice contrast to see species over in Europe (like Dwarf Mongoose and Yellow Mongoose) so many times that I'm not bored of them...and yet in the U.S. it would be Bobcats and Coyotes every single day. Ha!
 
Homin96 wrote about Czech drivers. Polish are much worse and dangerous. So if you decide on a second European trip, for example East Germany, Czechia and Poland I recommend using public transport (trains and buses).

To be fair, using public transport (at least in Czechia) is literally a no-brainer as you save so much money by it.

Where is the one-foot, thick layer of mulch that I’ve seen at some zoos?

Again, clashing of the two worlds - If I'll sometimes be in a situation when I will actually be a primate keeper and will have to choose between concrete and a very thin layer of mulch, I'm going concrete all the way, with putting extra wood wool there so they can make more nests from it.

Mulch is a great think - looks good, smells nice BUT if the layer is too thin (and 1 foot is too thin) it becomes just a mold trap. Concrete/mock rock, on the other hand, is germophobe's dream and every primate keeper (or every zookeeper to some extent) should be germophobe in a way. The current trend though is having very thick layers of mulch in pavilions (3 and a half feet minimum) and watering it regularly. This allows thriving of colonies of microorganisms and bacterias (the good ones) and the exhibit becomes "self-cleaning" to some extent. This, however, requires adequately deep floor and that is really not the case of old primate houses.

But if I really have to have something on the floor I would go peat, maybe slightly mixed with dirt/sand. This a bit better in terms of molding and also, if managed properly some grass can grow there which provides an extra bit of enrichment for animals and also it looks good in the eye of visitors (see Chimpanzee house in Magdeburg for example)
 
I think that you've seen all of the big German zoos that I've been visiting, but have you visited every German zoo that I've been to so far?

Oh, not even close!

Of your so-far-reviewed German zoos:

Gangelt - never visited
Alsdorf - never visited
Aachen - visited 2014
Frankfurt - visited 2010 (and severely overdue a repeat!)
Kronberg - visited 2010
Neuwied - never visited
SLC Konigswinter - never visited
Drachenwelt - never visited
Eckenhagen - never visited
Dunnwald - never visited
Cologne - visted 2009, 2010, 2014, 2019
Reuschenberg - never visited
Solingen V+T-park - visited 2014
Wuppertal - visited 2002, 2009, 2014, 2019
TP Fauna - visited 2014
Dortmund - visited 2009, 2019
Bochum - visited 2019
Gelsenkirchen - visited 2002 (Ruhr Zoo); 2009 and 2019 (ZOOM)
Duisburg - visited 2004, 2009, 2019
Aqua Zoo - visited 2009, 2019

2009 and 2019 both involved trips that were intended to be 'comprehensive' Rhine/Ruhr trips in terms of the big zoos; others were included on trips also including other regions.

As you can see, I've generally tended towards the larger zoos in this region (if we were discussing Rhineland-Palatinate it would be a little different!).

My current totals for collections visited in the countries on your trip are below - comparisons with your numbers are interesting..!

Germany - 89 collections
Netherlands - 18 collections
France - 17 collections
Belgium - 5 collections

(yep - in Belgium I've only done 5 collections, and one of those isn't even available to be on your list because it's since closed down (Aquatopia in Antwerp) - the others are Antwerp, Planckendael, Pairi Daiza and Olmense Zoo)
 
Sorry, ANyhuis. There are three species of orang-utans and two species of gorillas.
I guess you're right! But (according to the internet) this is a fairly new thing, as it says there were originally only one species of gorillas and one species orangutans. So I guess I'd rephrase and say Wuppertal is one of the few zoos with "All 4 Types of Great Apes".
 
Thanks for the massive list of species, with Latin names, that you posted on this thread from the Aquazoo Lobbecke Museum. That must have taken a heck of a long time to type out

Took me the best part of a whole day last year, not long after my visit to the collection :) and have had it sitting on my hard drive since, awaiting the time when it can be put to use.

But onto some other thoughts relating to the Aquazoo.....

by the time I walked in the door at Aquazoo I had exactly an hour and a half before closing time. Plenty of time, correct? Well, I did end up seeing everything in that time frame but I felt a tad rushed and so I would recommend setting aside at least two hours or more to view it all

We took about 2 hours to view the collection, but admittedly had to rush a little to keep to our overall timetable for the day (which also encompassed TerraZoo Rheinburg and Wildpark Grafenberger Wald) and I think longer is preferable by far!

One thing in my favour is that I can unfortunately not read any German and the lack of all-English signs in all of these zoos and aquariums is probably one of the biggest disappointments of the trip.

I've only got a faltering grasp of reading German myself - the general trick as far as animal exhibits goes is to have a good memory for Latin names ;)

I found Aquazoo Lobbecke Museum to be brilliant, engaging, informative and.....everything inside seems new and shiny. It’s a wonderful establishment and an absolute must-visit for a zoo nerd.

This is more or less how I would summarise the place too :) it's also one of the best aquariums I have visited by far, with only the two Iberian big names beating it.
 
I then made my way towards the famous, almost legendary, Rio Negro House. There are 16 exhibits in the first room and 3 big tanks plus free-ranging species in the second room and the whole thing is the best part of the zoo. I watched ‘Baby’ the Boto (Amazon River Dolphin) for a long time, sitting on a bench and becoming sort of transfixed with the movements of the animal. The Boto is larger up close than I was expecting, with a lot of scars and scratches all over his body. The contortions in the water, the opening and closing of the mouth, the swimming upside down and in all directions…it was all truly fascinating and worth the trip to Duisburg Zoo right then and there.

The million dollar question, then - given your open distaste voiced both here and in the past for captive cetaceans - is what you made of the exhibit quality in the Rio Negro :)

{Note from mods - discussion about captive cetaceans split to a new thread: Cetaceans in captivity}

and yet in the U.S. it would be Bobcats and Coyotes every single day. Ha!

You'll find Bobcats here and there in Europe, but Coyotes are hen's teeth! Until a recent import into a relatively-unknown French collection whose name escapes me they had been absent from European collections for some time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
if managed properly some grass can grow there which provides an extra bit of enrichment for animals and also it looks good in the eye of visitors (see Chimpanzee house in Magdeburg for example)

Not the biggest fan of chimpanzees, as is fairly well-known on Zoochat, but I have to say I was very impressed indeed by the new house for them at Magdeburg when I saw it in September 2018.

So I guess I'd rephrase and say Wuppertal is one of the few zoos with "All 4 Types of Great Apes".

Of course, if one is shifting the goalposts like that and deeming the two gorillas a single kind, and the three orangutans a single kind, it makes little sense to continue to call chimpanzee and bonobo two different "types" of great ape :P in which case you end up with "All 3 Types Of Great Apes" and rather a lot of zoos!
 
What has the required confirmation that your posts are really great about, to do with the thing for yourself now? I think you also have fun with it, otherwise you would not do it. Everyone here would have to constantly thank each other for various comments, postings, reviews and so on. Well, you attach importance to publicity, and it is also absolutely correct, but are you calling the ladies at the box office in Frankfurt as cranky old ladies and old buzzards, just because they opened the cash register only one minute after 9 o'clock? That's your courtesy? You realize that they have a pretty tough job? Not physically, but they have to deal with a lot of idiots every day ... and that's really no fun.Well, calling the two ladies at the cash register cranky old ladies and old buzzards-that's not very polite, even if you did not call them that-hopefully-so. It's unfortunate that you did not get your ticket until one minute past 9 o'clock, but patience is a virtue ... I could understand your anger if the two ladies did not start selling tickets until 5 minutes past 9,of course, it also depends on the clock that you use,.. Incidentally, the San Diego Zoo has significantly more visitors than Frankfurt. Much more annoying is the fact that Frankfurt are open at the weekend only two ticket booths and the people have to wait 2-3 hours until they are in the zoo, and so far was the case in Frankfurt. Only since a few weeks, the Zoo offers the opportunity to buy of online tickets ....

Well, you stand by your statement regarding the opening hours of the Grzimekhaus. However, it is not beneficial for the keepers who need the time to clean up the enclosure and that is also beneficial to you. They have to clean 25 exhibits in the night section,in only 90 Minutes-this is not very much. And, as I mentioned earlier, the animals have a one-hour twilight period. If the animals already have to live in a night-animal-home-without otdoor exhibits-then one should not just turn off the light. Incidentally, the Grzimekahus is already 41 years old, and no one has complained so far about opening it until 9:30 am - and earlier, the zoo opened at 8:00 am …

Oh no-the aquarium in Wuppertal stands on a hill? That is unfortunate but the whole zoo is quite mountainous, but the peple in Wuppertal know that, that's it for a long time ... I hope you do not visit the Alpine Zoo in Innsbruck ... ?;)Well, you can make the suggestion to the Zoos of Frankfurt and Wuppertal that the zookeepers already start to work at 5 o'clock , so that the houses can finally be opened together with the zoo. Even Bakers start working already at 4 o'clock, so that the people have their rolls at 6 o'clock at the latest ...:) By the way, in many zoos in the USA the zoos do not open until 10 o'clock and close at 5 o'clock as advantage that no animal house must be opened later. Even more common is the situation in Japan, as many zoos and aquariums have a rest day in the week where they have completely closed .

And as with the example of the Otter-Exhibit in the Grzimekhaus you show me again with your opinion regarding the Lemurhouse in Cologne, you are not able to judge an animal facility realistically and fair-even though you already have watched how many zoos ?, you judge only by your visual perception, without any consideration of all other factors. Incidentally, I have no problem criticizing even the "big, great " German zoos-yes, even the Berliner! Without legitimate criticism, all zoos in the world would not be where they are today. And your harsh criticism of the lemur house is not justified - the almost 50-year-old house from today's point of view may no longer correspond to the present time, but for the remaining livestock it is okay and offers the animals there a significantly higher quality of life than the Grzimekhaus in Frankfurt. I guess, the Aye-Aye’s and aardvarks would be happy to get an outdoor exhibit…. The elephant exhibit in Cologne is indeed in parts improbable, especially the outdoor facilities.Incidentally, there is much worse animal husbandry in the Cologne Zoo than in the lemur house, such as the tree kangaroos, gibbons and dwarf otters in the Rainforest Building in their very small, weakly structured indoor enclosures without outodoor enclosures-or the black rhino...Of course, it's great that you go to so much trouble with your detailed reviews and descriptions of your zoo tours, but others do the same without insisting that they appreciate it. It should be up to anyone, whether he does that or not?

Now I have written 9 postings to give you some background information on the situation in Frankfurt - a thank you from you I would have been happy. ( Just a Joke-I really don’t care about it;) )

Have fun with the bulldozer!Unfortunately, that's not enough for Jungle Word in the Bronx-Zoo, or Tragedy World in the Brookfield Zoo-you've got to blow them up .....
:)

I think @Bib Fortuna is being rather unfair to @snowleopard here. Like @Bib Fortuna, I disagree with quite a number of the points that @snowleopard makes. I think he is too easily impressed by things that are shiny and new, and which aim for a faux naturalism, and too quick to condemn things that are old, and which may not look great, even when they are tried and tested (I'm bracing myself for his review of Krefeld!). I also disagree with him on many other matters: films, football, music, cuisine - loads. Thank God for that! How tedious it would be to find myself in a world where everybody thought that Bruce Springsteen's new album was his best ever, that Portsmouth Football Club were sporting gods, that the films of Ken Loach trumped any Hollywood blockbuster, that there were few evenings that would not be enhanced by a very hot and spicy curry. And so too with zoos. I love Krefeld. I have very little interest in visiting Gelsenkirchen. I loathe Hannover. @snowleopard may very well see things differently. Thanks heavens!

And to have a go at him for not seeing the zoos from the eyes of a keeper is bonkers. He's not a keeper. He's a visitor. Thus he is seeing things from the eyes of a visitor. The keeping perspective is interesting, and may well change a visitor's perspective, but it is wholly unfair to suggest that someone shouldn't see things in a particular way. We all seek something different when we consider anything, be it a film, a football match or a zoo. From his excellent input above, I would guess that @HOMIN96 will be looking at a zoo from a keeping perspective. @snowleopard will be looking at exhibit quality. @ANyhuis will be looking at the associated rides and 'fun'. I will possibly be most interested in the species on display. And all approaches are valid!
 
From his excellent input above, I would guess that @HOMIN96 will be looking at a zoo from a keeping perspective. @snowleopard will be looking at exhibit quality. @ANyhuis will be looking at the associated rides and 'fun'. I will possibly be most interested in the species on display. And all approaches are valid!

Pretty good observations, Sooty, but recall that I am a travel guidebook writer, an thus I try to see things through the eyes of my prospective readers, who would likely be the typical visitors to zoos -- in particular families with children. Therefore I look for ALL of the things you're listing -- different species, "bonus" (most popular) animals, exhibit quality, cultural theming, and yes, for the "extras" that zoos offer, including fun rides and shows.
 
DAY 19: Thursday, August 1st (5 zoos)

Yes, @TeaLovingDave I am not a fan of cetaceans in captivity. I just read two books this year all about Orcas, reviewing one of them on ZooChat, and even setting aside the whole traumatic capture process of the 1960s and 1970s, the Orca tanks at the SeaWorld parks are simply not large enough and I've always thought that. Reading about how loads of Orcas have eye issues due to the chlorinated pools, or have terrible skin conditions due to the fact that they get sunburnt because they are always near the surface and cannot achieve the depths that they would in the ocean, etc., is tough. I'm happy to know that SeaWorld is eventually not going to have Orcas any longer and whales in captivity don't do it for me. Visiting the Vancouver Aquarium for decades and seeing the same Belugas circling around and around in a tiny tank and their entire lives are just going around and around in a small area...it was pitiful. As for the Rio Negro tank at Duisburg, 'Baby' has an area that cannot be altered and yet the space is not huge for a large aquatic species like a dolphin. I thought that the pool was better than I pictured it would be, which was a nice surprise, but at the end of the day there will never be a dolphin in that tank again and it's also too small for manatees.

I enjoyed reading about @sooty mangabey and his notion that we all look for different things in zoos. For sure I'm all about exhibit quality, which is why there are parts of ZOOM in Gelsenkirchen that are hugely impressive. At that zoo the animals, for the most part, have a great deal of space in comparison to other zoos on this trip and something like the sea lion habitat is miles and miles better than a lot of crappy other pinniped enclosures in German zoos. But, yet again, it is important to acknowledge that Gelsenkirchen also has deficiencies: slightly boring lineup of species, no cutbacks or surprises along the trail, very few oddities and character.

One thing that I've rarely touched on is the idea of playgrounds and stuff for kids, as so many zoo nerds completely don't care about such things. With 4 young children back at home, I am conscious of what works and doesn't work in play areas and I always take a stroll past playgrounds and kid-friendly parts of zoos. I rarely ever take any photos of play structures, unless there are zero children about, as I don't want people to think that I'm some sort of weirdo. However, having 4 young kids of my own and putting things in a child's perspective is arguably way more important than locating the last Mountain Anoa in a European zoo. All these zoos that I'm touring are filled to the brim with families, then couples, sometimes groups of people congregating at a zoo, and lastly with single individuals going to the zoo by themselves. Zoo nerds are probably 0.1% of the general zoo-visiting population.

When I'm looking at kid-friendly areas, I'm thinking about the height of exhibits. Would my youngest, who is only 4 years old, be able to see into that aquarium tank or is it set at an awkward angle? Would he be able to access the ladder in the play structure? If not then I'll have to stand there and help him up every single time. Are there lavatories adjacent to the play area or does a family have to search for them? Is there a food serving area nearby? Are signs posted that an older kid can read? Is that playground, which looks great from a distance, actually worthwhile? The slide might appear to be fantastic but is it protected from the sun and will it then become too hot and thus useless for children? Is there bark mulch in the playground or sand? If there are those tiny stones, which are great in terms of worker maintenance, then the kids get them in their shoes and they have to stop every five minutes to take off a shoe and dump out some mini rocks. Other people don't think about that stuff but I've seen it all a hundred times before.

There are a thousand things that I'm looking at as a visitor. Getting into the zoo in a timely fashion is actually vitally important. Often families are driving from afar and when they arrive at the zoo then the kids all have to go pee and if a zoo delays entry its incredibly annoying. Lavatories should be directly inside the zoo and families should never have to consult maps to find things like the bathroom or a garbage can. I clearly look at the quality of the animal exhibits, but I'm keeping track of all the species in certain buildings, analyzing the history of zoos with my hundreds of zoo books, memorizing stats and facts, and never forgetting that it is a family that drives a zoo forward. If I was to own a zoo then having Zorillas, Roloway Monkeys, Crocodile Monitors and Ratels would be fantastic, but I'd 100% need a high-quality, efficient entrance, large lavatory facilities, lots of garbage cans and a huge playground (set off to one side) along with everything else. Zoos are like mini-cities at times, with so many variables that it is a fascinating thing to study them. I look at everything in a zoo and to be honest I think that my approach is fairly balanced. Zoo nerd status...family man...perspective from my 4 kids...wife's thoughts on efficiency and cleanliness...and yet I still loving seeing the odd rarity like Red-tailed Moustached Monkeys at ZOOM.

One thing that has become apparent is that zoos are improving immeasurably. It's at the point now where the Lowland Gorilla exhibit at Wuppertal Zoo was mildly disappointing. The gorillas have an outdoor yard with a few rocks and trees, with grass everywhere, but the whole thing has many awkward viewing areas and it's really not very large. A decade or two ago and Wuppertal's gorilla enclosure would have been brilliant...what will it look like in 20 years? Will it even be in existence in another 20 years? One thing that I am totally against is keeping great apes inside for their entire lives. It is brutal and inhumane, regardless of the circumstances, and that brings me to Krefeld Zoo.

Five reviews:

Zoo/Aquarium # 56: Krefeld Zoo (Krefeld, DE)

I enjoyed parts of Krefeld Zoo, but there are 5 exhibits that are so atrocious that it unfortunately drags down the whole zoo because those 5 sections stick in one’s mind for days afterwards. This zoo opened in 1938 and is set on 34 acres/14 hectares. The annual attendance figure that I have is 500,000 and when I left the zoo after about two hours the lineup to get inside was overwhelming. The number of moms with kids in strollers was almost worth a photo, although I would have had some strange glances if I had clicked my camera. I’ll begin with the good stuff and save the 5 bad exhibits until the end.

There is a lot to recommend about a zoo that has a fleet of keepers and volunteers out sweeping leaves, cleaning tabletops, washing a fence (!!) and generally buzzing around keeping the grounds tidy for visitors. The zoo, just like Artis and a couple of others, has a Bactrian Camel exhibit early on with minimal barriers. I just want to yell at the camels, “Hey, do you know that you can simply take a couple of steps and you are outta this joint?” There’s a basic South American mixed-species yard, California Sea Lions in yet another boring and unimaginative yet adequate pinniped exhibit, a terrific ‘Zoo School’ education building that looks like a quaint, rural cottage that has been stolen from Cotsworld Wildlife Park, and a superb Humboldt Penguin exhibit that is arguably the best thing in the zoo. It’s not as large or as awe-inspiring as what takes place at Planckendael, but it’s great nonetheless.

Krefeld has a small Tropical House that was under construction during my visit. I went through it, but there was an immense set of scaffolding to the roof, a closed-down Green Anaconda exhibit, a closed-down spiral staircase to the canopy, and no appearance of any bats although they were still labeled. I did see an ultra-cool Leaf-cutter Ant display that I could have reached out and easily touched, but I’m not sure of the healthcare setup over here in Germany for Canadian visitors. Southern Tamanduas were nowhere to be seen, but I did see a White-faced Saki and a Smooth-fronted Caiman. Moving on, there is an excellent Black Rhino exhibit, the usual motley crew of Meerkats, and a Pygmy Hippo tantalizingly close to my camera-holding arm. They are apparently vicious little bastards, if a memoir from a former Cleveland Zoo keeper has any truth to it, and so I resisted giving one a quick scratch.

I really liked the African Savanna (Greater Kudu, Impala, Ostrich) and the big Asian yard (Nilgai, Chital, Blackbuck) and farther on there is an excellent Bird House (only 5 aviaries but they are all rather splendid), Red River Hogs, the last Mountain Anoa in all of Europe (I have a photo of the bottom-half of its body), a football stadium right next door, plus a nice Lowland Gorilla outdoor yard. Silver Marmosets, Golden Lion Tamarins and Pygmy Marmosets are all to be found in the Primate House. The zoo has a list of other species, including Snow Leopard, Sumatran Tiger, Cheetah, Jaguar, Jaguarundi, Goodfellow’s Tree Kangaroo, European River Otter, Guereza (locked indoors while repairs were ongoing to their exhibit), with all of these enclosures hit-and-miss in terms of quality.

Okay…takes a deep breath…the 5 outrageous exhibits are for Asian Elephants, Chimpanzees, Bornean Orangutans, Siamang(s) and Hamadryas Baboons. Krefeld Zoo’s elephant exhibit might well be the smallest that I’ve ever seen. I’m sure that the two elephants there are elderly and when they die that will then be the end of elephants at this zoo, but the fact remains that the current situation is dire. The Chimpanzees, other than a dodgy place in Arkansas and a couple of other zoos (DeYoung Family in Michigan and West Coast Game Park Safari in Oregon) have the single-worst chimp exhibit that I’ve ever seen. It is completely indoors, with zero access to the outside, the stairs and floor are all cement and looking at my photos I would estimate that 2% of the surface has hay while the other 98% is unyielding cement. The 5 apes can climb to a height of perhaps 7 feet on well-worn fake tree trunks, and there are a couple of hammocks and maybe two ropes. The 5 chimps were all sitting or laying around like statues and they didn’t move for ten minutes because they were probably wishing that they were dead. How is that situation defensible? There are two elderly Gorillas in a similar situation but let’s give that a pass for now, and the Bornean Orangutan environment is slightly better than the chimp one mainly because they have twice the amount of indoor space…but still are in a horrendous zoo exhibit that is downright disgraceful. I’m surprised that there weren’t any protestors outside, and on that note, I’ve only seen two people protesting outside of a zoo this entire trip. There was a man and woman with signs and posters who were outside the gates of Duisburg Zoo and politely handing out leaflets about the Dolphinarium. Does anyone know if Duisburg regularly receives protestors?

Krefeld’s Siamang(s) cage has been discussed before on ZooChat and it’s a veritable paradise compared to the chimp/orang indoor monstrosity. Finally, Hamadryas Baboons are on the tiniest rock island imaginable, with indoor quarters smaller than one of the lavatories in my house back in British Columbia and I swear that I’m not exaggerating...that indoor space is puny for all those baboons. I’m not sure how anyone can justify keeping a small troop of baboons in such an environment. Even if the baboons were all three-legged orphans from a Somalian monkey sanctuary, there is simply no excuse. I know that my good friend @sooty mangabey will make an attempt, but I cannot conceive of what he will say to explain all 5 of the exhibits. I wrote about some of the things that I liked about Krefeld here, but between the elephants, chimps, orangs, siamang(s) and baboons, there is a whole bunch of truly ghastly exhibits that have no place in a modern-day zoo in the year 2019. Sometimes we ‘forgive’ a zoo because there is a famous blemish (Zurich’s Ape House for example) in an otherwise excellent establishment, but Krefeld has at least FIVE exhibits that are ugly, impractical and arguably cruel for the maintaining of intelligent mammals. Krefeld…you suck.

I then drove 20 minutes north to a Reptile Zoo.

Zoo/Aquarium #57: TerraZoo (Rheinberg, DE)

I don’t have a complete species list for this facility, but I did take a photo of every single sign and so at some point I could compile a new list at a later date. (I’m secretly hoping that another zoo nerd has visited in the past couple of years and already has a species list). A giant Frilled Lizard statue, the size of my rental car, greets visitors outside what appears to be an ordinary-looking building. Inside I was immediately hit by the smell of at least 5 Ring-tailed Lemurs, seen directly inside the entrance area. After that it is basically all reptiles, with an astonishing collection of venomous snakes that must be pretty high on the list of European establishments in terms of quantity of venomous species.

Some species that are at TerraZoo include Mangrove Snake, Black Mamba, Green Mamba, Inland Taipan, Western Diamondback Rattlesnake, a couple of pit viper types, Arabian Cobras (two of them and there aren’t very many others on the continent), Indian Cobra, Crocodile Monitor and a long list of other exciting creatures. The collection is fantastic, the vivaria are well-furnished and for the most part quite impressive, but this facility is lacking in general cleanliness. The floors could use a good scrub, many of the signs on the terrariums are peeling or faded, the bathrooms were nasty, and an air of decrepitude was everywhere. A couple of big Nile Crocodiles have an exhibit that is difficult to see into due to the windows being messy in sections…although who really wants to go in there to clean the windows? Outside there are small alligators that one would easily be able to touch if so inclined (the usual minimal barriers) and the lack of signs and general orderliness in the outdoor area is head-scratching. Still, if one is willing to overlook the slight neglect about the place, then there is much to admire with the quality of the animal exhibits and the terrific collection of venomous snakes.

I then drove 30 minutes east to an Aquarium.

Zoo/Aquarium # 58: Sea Life Oberhausen (Oberhausen, DE)

Getting to this facility is a bit of a pain, as one has to use a parking garage down the street that is packed with cars due to the fact that there is a large indoor waterpark on the same general site. Once parking is done, it is necessary to walk down the street, join the crowds at the door, and then get bashed around for 40 minutes as if I’m some fizz in a can of cola due to the congestion. After the 40 minutes is up, and a few piranhas and seahorses have been stared at, I emerged into the daylight and headed back to the garage to get my vehicle. Another Sea Life ticked off my bucket list and Oberhausen’s Aquarium is a little better than some other Sea Life facilities and I enjoyed the outdoor Small-clawed Otter exhibit. I’d love to get some hard data on annual visitor records at any of the Sea Life aquariums as every time I go to one, they are always so damn busy. Is it because of their small, constricted size, or are people genuinely turning up by the hundreds because they adore them?

I then drove approximately 8 minutes down the road.

Zoo/Aquarium # 59: Tiergehege Kaisergarten (Oberhausen, DE)

Set in a scenic park, I first thought that I’d made an error because the zoo didn’t unfold the way that I had expected. There are some Red Deer in a simple, fenced yard, and the entrance to this place is nicely done with a very professional sign and map. Parking is free, there is no entrance fee, and the joint was hopping with German families everywhere. There’s a barnyard zone with many domestic animals, a budgie walk-through aviary, some Alpacas, chickens, goats, Prairie Dogs, and it’s all very professionally taken care of. But is it really a zoo? The answer became ‘yes’! There is a trio of large aviaries (Common Raven, Snowy Owl, Eurasian Eagle Owl) that showed promise, and then some more ‘zoo-like’ species began to be seen. Alpine Ibex, Raccoon, Nutria, Eurasian Lynx, European Wild Boar, Mouflon, Small-clawed Otter and an empty Grey Wolf exhibit but it is filled with wolf-sized placards and a sign says something about ‘Wolf 2020’ so perhaps that species is making a return to the zoo next year. In the end it wasn’t such a bad way to kill an hour, with the absolute highlight a little Mouse House building that wouldn’t be something to make the Bronx jealous but nevertheless thrilled me. A small wooden building off to the side, with rodent cut-outs all around it, looked interesting and inside are three exhibits for the following species: Bank Vole, Eurasian Harvest Mouse and Garden Dormouse. There are fake trees, a slightly dimmed-light, three decently-sized exhibits and I saw two out of three species. I’ll have to come back one day to see a Bank Vole!

I then drove about 50 minutes south to the 5th and final small zoo of the day.

Zoo/Aquarium #60: Tiergarten Monchengladbach (Monchengladbach, DE)

The 60th zoo of the trip contains a small Monkey House (Crab-eating Macaques and Tufted Capuchins), a Cat House (two exhibits of Eurasian Lynx and then a single Ocelot) and both those buildings surely held larger species at one point in time. There are two old bear grottoes that now hold Small-clawed Otters in one enclosure and Raccoons mixed with Coatis in the other. There are Common Seals in an outdated pinniped pool, Bennett’s Wallabies with Emus, Wisent, Prairie Dogs, Banded Mongooses, European Mink, and at least a dozen aviaries scattered across the grounds.

There ends another day when I only drove for a couple of hours and I quite easily saw 5 small zoos. Once again I will remark on the incredible proximity to each other of multiple zoos in countless cities in Europe. If it's taken me a long time to get close to 500 zoos, just think how many I'd be at if I lived somewhere in the Netherlands, Belgium or Germany. There would be a little getaway every other weekend and I'd likely be approaching 1,000 zoos or even more. There are so many 'wildparks' and 'tierparks' and 'tiergartens' just in Germany alone that it is sort of mind-boggling...and everywhere I go seems reasonably busy. I realize that I'm venturing out in the summertime, in arguably peak season, but to see large throngs of people in Monchengladbach's little zoo is sort of heart-warming. People really enjoy zoos in Germany and I have now finished 'leg three' of my trip. In a full week in Germany I toured 25 zoos. Now it is time to dip back into the Netherlands for at least 5 days before eventually heading back to Germany later in the trip.

Here is the list of 25 German zoos that I've seen so far (with the three aquariums in bold):

1- Wildpark Gangelt (Gangelt, DE)

2- Alsdorf Tierpark (Alsdorf, DE)

3- Aachener Zoo (Aachen, DE)

4- Frankfurt Zoo (Frankfurt, DE)

5- Opel Zoo (Kronberg, DE)

6- Zoo Neuwied (Neuwied, DE)

7- Konigswinter Sea Life (Konigswinter, DE)

8- Drachenwelt (Dragon World) Reptile Zoo (Konigswinter, DE)

9- Affen + Vogelpark Eckenhagen (Monkey + Bird Park) (Eckenhagen, DE)

10- Wildpark Dunnwald (Cologne, DE)

11- Kolner Zoo (Cologne, DE)

12- Wildpark Reuschenberg (Leverkusen, DE)

13- Solinger Vogel-und Tierpark (Bird and Animal Park) (Solingen, DE)

14- Wuppertal Zoo (Wuppertal, DE)

15- Tierpark Fauna (Solingen-Grafrath, DE)

16- Dortmund Zoo (Dortmund, DE)

17- Tierpark + Fossilium Bochum (Bochum, DE)

18- ZOOM Erlebniswelt (Gelsenkirchen, DE)

19- Duisburg Zoo (Duisburg, DE)

20- Aquazoo Lobbecke Museum (Dusseldorf, DE)

21- Krefeld Zoo (Krefeld, DE)

22- TerraZoo (Rheinberg, DE)

23- Sea Life Oberhausen (Oberhausen, DE)

24- Tiergehege Kaisergarten (Oberhausen, DE)

25- Tiergarten Monchengladbach (Monchengladbach, DE)
 
, has a Bactrian Camel exhibit early on with minimal barriers. I just want to yell at the camels, “Hey, do you know that you can simply take a couple of steps and you are outta this joint?”

You know that Bactrian camels are actually somehow incapable of managing even a small dry moat...

, and no appearance of any bats although they were still labeled

Did you find the small cave, they are always hanging around there..

The Chimpanzees, other than a dodgy place in Arkansas and a couple of other zoos (DeYoung Family in Michigan and West Coast Game Park Safari in Oregon) have the single-worst chimp exhibit that I’ve ever seen. It is completely indoors, with zero access to the outside, the stairs and floor are all cement and looking at my photos I would estimate that 2% of the surface has hay while the other 98% is unyielding cement.

Construction on an outdoor enclosure should start very soon. Krefeld is a poor zoo and it took ages to get the necessary funds. Just as a note, in the 80ies the Krefeld ape house was seen as the pinnacle of how to display great apes and the house was copied by other zoos (somehow forgetting about Burgers' and Apenheul), most notably Rhenen and Cologne.

Does anyone know if Duisburg regularly receives protestors?

They do from time to time, not too long ago these protestors even jumped in the Dolphin pool during a show. I agree that that pool is inadequate, but the reaction of the public was very much against the protestors...

Krefeld’s Siamang(s) cage has been discussed before on ZooChat and it’s a veritable paradise compared to the chimp/orang indoor monstrosity.

I think you are too harsh by ignoring the circumstances, nobody will argue it is an adequate enclosure, but would it be better to move a geriatric Siamang to new surroundings? I personally have more problems with a zoo like Pairi Daiza that willfully puts animals in enclosures that are known to be completely unsuitable, just as their Javan leopard, then a zoo that is stuck with remains from a gone era. Krefeld is aware that not everything is adequate and you won't see me defending that Baboon rock.

I’ll have to come back one day to see a Bank Vole!

Wait until tomorrow, pretty good chance you will see them in the wild...
 
So much to respond to and hopefully I don't miss anyone.

First of all, kudos to @Maguari for consistently replying in a positive manner, even when you disagree with some of the things that I've said. That makes for a great forum and healthy debate is a fascination for all of us. I think that you've seen all of the big German zoos that I've been visiting, but have you visited every German zoo that I've been to so far?

@DavidBrown the Kea exhibit that goes from one aviary and under a weird boardwalk to another aviary is at De Paay Zoo in the Netherlands...probably a strong contender for one of the Top 5 all-time worst zoos I've seen in my lifetime. The stench, the peeling signs, the utter disregard for cleanliness...shocking and I'm really surprised that the place hasn't been shut down. I will have to think how harsh I want that review to go, but it was an awful zoo in so many ways even with its rarities.

@Batto , your comment about the charging for zoo maps had me chuckling out loud. The audacity indeed! On my North American trips I would always grab 5 or 6 zoo maps so that I could use one to crinkle and analyze around the zoo, another for my collection at home of almost 2,000 good-conditioned ones, and then several more to trade with folks on this forum. @Arek , @sooty mangabey and @devilfish , to name just three. Sorry folks, but I have been only buying two maps (both for myself) as I don't like the idea of buying 5 or 6 maps at each zoo when 95% of all the zoos I've ever visited have had free maps. It would be bloody expensive. At least there are some guidebooks over here in Europe and far more than the paltry few that are located in North America.

As for the Tour de France, @Arizona Docent , I would rather skip that event. I've seen enough cyclists here to last a lifetime, including some groups in the Dutch countryside with 5 guys all dressed in identical blue outfits (like speedy Smurfs) or another group had all yellow-and-black tights on as they raced down the street and I thought it was a swarm of wasps!

@TeaLovingDave Thanks for the massive list of species, with Latin names, that you posted on this thread from the Aquazoo Lobbecke Museum. That must have taken a heck of a long time to type out...but thanks anyway as I really enjoyed that place and I'm glad that it was my 100th aquarium. It was a slight upgrade on a typical Sea Life. :p

@Arek Please keep the intriguing historical zoo facts coming as I love reading about them. You mentioned the 'Red-tailed Moustached Monkeys' at Gelsenkirchen and how that zoo is one of only three on the continent to have them. That's a fact that I love learning about. Cheers...and I'm so glad that I spent time watching such a rare species.

@vogelcommando It was great meeting up with you and you'll appear in this thread again when I get around to typing it up. Thanks for the Corsac Fox memories!

@lintworm Thanks for your input at several junctures in this thread. I prefer the Planckendael, Gelsenkirchen and GaiaZOO type of zoos but I also like the same zoos that you prefer (Artis, Cologne, Antwerp) ...just not as much as you do. ;) One thing for certain, whether we all like it or not, it would seem that most zoos are not building the massive animal houses any longer and the zoos of the future are slightly more modern and naturalistic like the Planckendaels of the world. Having said that, I saw the 'Pandasia' complex at Ouwehands Zoo and that is one enormous set of structures. I didn't really like the zoo in Rhenen, but that Giant Panda building is a memorable addition to a popular zoo.

I cannot forget about @Bib Fortuna whom I've heard is an interesting guy from those that have met him via his 3 or 4 different aliases on ZooChat over the years or even at ZooHistorica each September. I think that you and I would have more in common in regards to zoos than you might initially think. I loved Frankfurt and also strongly dislike Tropic World at Brookfield Zoo, although you lumping it to together with JungleWorld in the Bronx is a bit harsh. Don't worry, I have thrown a lot of criticism at North American zoos over the years and you can always re-read old threads for the proof. Maybe it's because I'm over in Europe right now on a daily basis, but there is part of me that thinks maybe the European zoos are truly better overall. It's a tough call, and also a regional thing, as the zoos of certain unnamed nations in Europe won't register too highly while the zoos in the nations that I'm visiting are mainly impressive.

I've had a few emails and messages about the differences between Europe and America in terms of zoos (let's fact it, the U.S. dominates North America for zoos) and that's why I've been mentioning a few things here and there.

Europe 'wins' for elephant houses, giraffe houses and antelope houses because they are often large structures and the public can enter into most of them. Primate outdoor exhibits, especially the walk-through yards everywhere, is a clear bonus for European zoos. European zoos win for historic architecture, ornate design and historical value. Another win is birds of prey, plus the halting of pinioning birds in savanna enclosures. Europe might have better quality in terms of reptile terrariums, with fairly large sizes the norm. Europe wins for small animals like bats, rats and mice.

North America 'wins' in a big way for amenities. Whether it is gift shops, drinking fountains everywhere, free parking at many places, countless free zoo maps, free washrooms, etc.. Those are all extremely important aspects of a zoo visit. North America probably has far greater reptile collections in terms of quantity of species, and I'm not even talking about venomous snakes but a collection overall. Elephant exhibits are larger in the U.S., with much more space, as the zoos do tend to be larger than their Euro counterparts. The U.S. wins for pinnipeds.

It seems to me that big cats are fairly even, with the same going for bears. I think that North America might have more underwater viewing options for polar bears, grizzlies bears, tigers, penguins, etc., although that could be just anecdotal. One thing that I've noticed is that a LOT of the underwater viewing in Europe sees the water all green and it is something that then makes underwater viewing a mute point. I saw a Pygmy Hippo dive into a pool at GaiaZOO and I might as well have been looking at a wall painted green. I would say that 75% of all the underwater viewing has been very poor in Europe. In the U.S. all of the pools are crystal clear, which I wonder whether is actually better for the animals or not? My gut feeling is that the untreated, perhaps chlorine-free water in the European pools is better for the skin and eyes of the animals, with the viewing conditions in the U.S. better for visitors. I'm just guessing there...

Anyway, I could go on all day long and at the end of the day there's not much to choose between the two continents in terms of zoos. There are a lot of differences and so it's a nice contrast to see species over in Europe (like Dwarf Mongoose and Yellow Mongoose) so many times that I'm not bored of them...and yet in the U.S. it would be Bobcats and Coyotes every single day. Ha!

I can not remember that we ever met at a zoohistorica ... Wanting to blow up Jungle World and Tragedy World is not much different from trying to flatten the lemur house in Cologne with a bulldozer - I see the two houses in these zoos too much more critical than the lemur house in Cologne. But I would not go so far as to say that the European zoos would be better than the American, Dutch better than German or French better than English, or the other way around, because all zoos have their weak points and give rise to criticism. For this reason, I also reject all zoo rankings, because the best zoo does not exist, neither in a country nor on a continent. There will never be a"best zoo" - there are only good, bad and average zoos. There are also more general ones than local developments in zoo keeping, which I have to critise, on both sides of the Atlantic. Of course, there are also local zoo incidents that I reject, such as in Denmark, or the disgusting Russian wirld catches of orcas, belugas, and walruses that are sold every year to zoos and aquariums in China and Russia.
 
I wrote about some of the things that I liked about Krefeld here, but between the elephants, chimps, orangs, siamang(s) and baboons, there is a whole bunch of truly ghastly exhibits that have no place in a modern-day zoo in the year 2019.

The baboon island boggles me.

The others at least have solutions in the pipeline - adding the outdoor areas to the ape house being the big one (which is arguably not really two separate problems - it was all one massive problem that has so far been one-third resolved!). Note that the Ape House is almost identical to Cologne's, right down to floor plan, except that Cologne's has already been furnished with those outdoor areas - so that gives you an idea of the scale of change possible.

I'd be amazed if either the siamang or elephant enclosures survive the lifespans of their current residents, so in time these will also slip away.

But I suspect that baboon island is going nowhere.

It's a shame the tropical house still had construction going on, as that was one of the best exhibits on my first visit, and still a highlight in June. The bats were hiding out in their cave near the ants (as is normal) when I was there and most of the reptiles were still in place. What did you make of the much newer penguin/Inca Tern aviary? This, the gorillas and the bird house are the signs of what Krefeld can become once it is able to fund its required changes.
 
As for the Rio Negro tank at Duisburg, 'Baby' has an area that cannot be altered and yet the space is not huge for a large aquatic species like a dolphin. I thought that the pool was better than I pictured it would be, which was a nice surprise, but at the end of the day there will never be a dolphin in that tank again and it's also too small for manatees.

Funny thing is, it's now believed his longevity is precisely because he doesn't have a huge, deep pool :P turns out that river dolphins - at least in his species - are incapable of unihemispheric sleep and therefore cannot sleep on the move as oceanic cetaceans can, and need areas shallow enough to beach themselves whilst they sleep. Therefore, one of the major reasons that scores of river dolphins imported into Western collections had brief lifespans is that they tended towards either drowning or dying of exhaustion due to the tank style enclosures they were placed in. Both the old river dolphin exhibit at Duisburg (which now forms the indoor housing for Giant Otter, and it is mind-boggling that it once held five Boto) and the new exhibit avoided this issue.

I don’t have a complete species list for this facility, but I did take a photo of every single sign and so at some point I could compile a new list at a later date. (I’m secretly hoping that another zoo nerd has visited in the past couple of years and already has a species list).

Your hopes were not in vain ;) as noted above I visited the same day as the Aquazoo! I'd be interested to hear if any of the species I list below were absent for you, or indeed if any major additions have turned up. The list goes exhibit by exhibit as I came to them, so there are a few duplicate species noted in different exhibits:

TERRAZOO RHEINBURG

1) American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii), Rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) and Roach (Rutilus rutilus)
2) Aldabra giant tortoise (Aldabrachelys gigantea gigantea) and Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta)
3) Common leopard gecko (Eublepharis macularius)
4) White-lipped pitviper (Trimeresurus albolabris)
5) Chinese crocodile lizard (Shinisaurus crocodilurus)
6) Puff adder (Bitis arietans)
7) Transcaucasian long-nosed viper (Vipera transcaucasiana) and Nose-horned viper (Vipera ammodytes)
8) Argentine black and white tegu (Salvator merianae)
9) Royal python (Python regius) and Angolan python (Python anchietae)
10) Eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus)
11) Green and black poison dart frog (Dendrobates auratus), Yellow-banded poison dart frog (Dendrobates leucomelas), Dyeing poison frog (Dendrobates tinctorius citronella), Golden poison frog (Phyllobates terribilis “La Brea”), Golden Poison Frog (Phyllobates terribilis “Quebrada Guangui”), Green tree python (Morelia viridis) and Cuban brown anole (Anolis sagrei)
12) Shingleback skink (Tiliqua rugosa) and Common blue-tongued skink (Tiliqua scincoides)
13) Black mamba (Dendroaspis polylepis)
14) Mangrove snake (Boiga dendrophila)
15) Collett's snake (Pseudechis colletti)
16) Southern copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix)
17) White-throated monitor (Varanus albigularis)
18) Inland taipan (Fierce Snake) (Oxyuranus microlepidotus)
19) Gila monster (Heloderma suspectum)
20) Australian water dragon (Intellagama lesueuri howittii)
21) Central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps)
22) Panther chameleon (Furcifer pardalis)
23) Chinese Banded King Cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) sensu lato
24) Arabian cobra (Naja arabica)
25) UNDER CONSTRUCTION
26) Honduran milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum hondurensis)
27) Collett's snake (Pseudechis colletti)
28) Indian cobra (Naja naja)
29) Dwarf bearded dragon (Pogona henrylawsoni)
30) Cave beauty snake (Orthriophis taeniurus ridleyi)
31) Malagasy tree boa (Sanzinia madagascariensis) and Dumeril's boa)
32) Mexican Red-knee Tarantula (Brachypelma smithi)
33) Giant Blue Scorpion (Heterometrus spinifer)
34) Chilean rose tarantula (Grammostola rosea)
35) EMPTY TANK
36) Indian Ornamental Tree Spider (Poecilotheria regalis)
37) Salmon Pink Tarantula (Lasiodora parahybana)
38) Socotra Island Blue Baboon (Monocentropus balfouri)
39) Reisinger's tree monitor (Varanus reisingeri)
40) Giant Millipede (Remulopygus brevispinus)
41) Transvaal Thick-tailed Scorpion (Parabuthus transvaalicus)
42) Yellow-bellied slider (Trachemys scripta scripta), Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) and Chinese soft-shelled turtle (Pelodiscus sinensis)
43) Common green iguana (Iguana iguana) – freeroaming
44) Brazilian Red Bird-eater (Lasiodora difficilis)
45) Burgundy Goliath Bird-eater (Theraphosa stirmi)
46) Corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus
47) Rough-scaled bush viper (Atheris squamigera
48) Giant Blue Scorpion (Heterometrus spinifer)
49) Spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata)
50) Tonkin bug-eyed frog (Theloderma corticale)
51) Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina)
52) Argentine horned frog (Ceratophrys ornata)
53) Cuban giant dusky dwarf boa (Tropidophis melanurus)
54) Laced moray (Gymnothorax favagineus), Red lionfish (Pterois volitans), Banded Sea Urchin (Echinothrix calamaris), Brittlestar (Ophiocoma pumila) and Long-spined Sea Urchin (Diadema setosum)
55) Two-toed amphiuma (Amphiuma means)
56) Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus)
57) Knight anole (Anolis equestris) and Tomato frog (Dyscophus antongilii)
 
I can not remember that we ever met at a zoohistorica ...

I believe that snowleopard was referring to accounts he has heard from people who have met you in person at Zoohistorica :) which would be quite a lot of us, myself included.
 
Back
Top