99%? That seems exaggerated, but I understand your point.
I still think that more media attention (not necessarily a lot, but more) would be given to the extinction of an entire species of large mammal, especially if it's a "last animal alive dies" situation, rather than decades of waiting for another confirmed sighting before finally deciding that it's extinct.
Higher numbers of specimens do not necessarily mean greater success, especially when many of them are overaged, infertile, unwilling to reproduce or not accessible. The numbers of breeding success are higher-but only relatively. Just because a tortoise is faster than a snail, it's still not a hare.I don't know if the populations are "truly" self-sustainable. I do know that their captive populations are exponentially larger than that for the Sumatran rhino, which gives them a much better chance of becoming self-sustainable if they aren't already. And the captive breeding rates with those species currently, I believe, are higher than the rates have ever been for Sumatrans.
What is the real difference between a species and a subspecies?
And a similar question:What's the difference between race and sub species?
Another article on the same topic: New hope for Sumatran rhino in Borneo | WWF
What are peoples opinions about cloning?
People always talk about after the northern white rhino goes extinct they might be able to clone it with all the tissue and stuff from ones in san diego zoo's frozen zoo.
Could this work for sumatran rhinos too?
By the way, just because I am saying this, it does not mean I think we should just stop everything and let people kill them all, I just think that hope might not all be lost.
I'm pretty interested in the possibility of cloning animals for conservation purposes. Everyone talks about cloning extinct animals, but I wonder if cloning technology could be used to help out struggling extant species. Especially if DNA could be extracted from preserved specimens, they could bring back genes that no longer exist in the current population, thus improving genetic diversity. (a major issue for many endangered species) Though that kind of technology is a long way off, cloning is still so expensive and impractical.
Very sad news, Najaq the newly found rhino has died from a leg infection
Rare Rhino Dies Days After Her Rediscovery
I'm pretty interested in the possibility of cloning animals for conservation purposes. Everyone talks about cloning extinct animals, but I wonder if cloning technology could be used to help out struggling extant species. Especially if DNA could be extracted from preserved specimens, they could bring back genes that no longer exist in the current population, thus improving genetic diversity. (a major issue for many endangered species) Though that kind of technology is a long way off, cloning is still so expensive and impractical.
I've personally encountered cloned specimens of wild species. It kinda robbed me of the confidence in the merits of this procedure for conservation that Colin Tudge instilled in me in Last Animals at the Zoo ...