The "Last-Chance Saloon" Tour of a Tea-Loving Dave - 2018

the only thing it’s missing of my thoughts is the emotional reaction to finally seeing manatees underwater, and specifically those which I had been desperate to see for years.

Indeed - I strongly suspect that I would have had a similar experience were it not for the fact that I had already seen manatees underwater at Nuremburg :p

The Bush is also fair, would’ve liked to hear your thoughts on the sectioned off enclosures in there (aardvarks etc)?

Off the top of my head I don't recall much about most of these exhibits - though I am sure I would recall more if I consulted my photographs - but I do recall the pool which was pointed out to me as the old home of the manatees. It wasn't great, and probably worse than the "old" enclosure for them at Nuremberg (which had been converted to a pool for Malayan Tapir when I visited), and the exhibit at Tierpark Berlin which gets a lot of flak on this site. So I am definitely glad they have moved ;)

As for the enclosures for the aardvarks, which I also recall pretty clearly - they were quite good and gave the inhabitants plenty of space... I just felt that the exhibits could have been put to much better use than aardvarks, which don't even fit geographically with the rainforest "remit" of Bush :p Personally I hope that if - as seems likely - the Congo Blue Duiker exhibit is on the chopping block so that redevelopment can take place in this area, the species is moved into Bush and the collection elects to get rid of the aardvarks to make space for them.

Also would’ve liked to hear your thoughts on the Tunnel, if you went in there...

That's the tunnel connecting Bush and Desert which was designed to feel like an old mine, yeah? I did actually mention it in passing at the start of the Desert segment, but to repeat; I really liked it! Plenty of nice species in there, even if i failed to see the Rock Squirrel, and it's the kind of nocturnal exhibit which more collections should attempt in my opinion.
 
Off the top of my head I don't recall much about most of these exhibits - though I am sure I would recall more if I consulted my photographs - but I do recall the pool which was pointed out to me as the old home of the manatees. It wasn't great, and probably worse than the "old" enclosure for them at Nuremberg (which had been converted to a pool for Malayan Tapir when I visited), and the exhibit at Tierpark Berlin which gets a lot of flak on this site. So I am definitely glad they have moved ;)

The former manatee pool in the Bush is about 5-10 times the size of the former Nuremberg pool (it is now a Caiman enclosure) and it is for sure bigger than the one in Berlin, though less deep.


Overall I was quite surprised you rated this zoo so highly as compared to your other favorites it has a relatively small collection (though what is there is full of rarities in most species groups).
 
Very interesting reviews so far! Always nice to see others' opinions of zoos I visit often.

I definitely hope Burgers' does not get rid of their aardvarks though... That species breeds better in those enclosures than they do anywhere else in Europe, and in the wild aardvarks do also inhabitate (rain)forests, though I admit it is not a species I would immediately associate with a rainforest either. Burgers' has to be doing something right with them, with so many births!
I'm sure if Burgers wants to they could find a solution for the duikers somewhere in the bush...
 
The former manatee pool in the Bush is about 5-10 times the size of the former Nuremberg pool (it is now a Caiman enclosure) and it is for sure bigger than the one in Berlin, though less deep.

I may be thinking of the wrong pool, then :p

Overall I was quite surprised you rated this zoo so highly as compared to your other favorites it has a relatively small collection (though what is there is full of rarities in most species groups).

It's worth recalling that some of my favourite UK collections include places such as Living Coasts and Highland Wildlife Park which are relatively low in species but done very well :p
 
Part VII: The Artis Of Being A Zoonerd

One of the biggest perks, as one might imagine, of staying in the city centre of Amsterdam only 20 minutes walk or so from Artis is the ability to have a bit of a lie-in in the morning before getting up and ready for another busy day of zoo-visiting; given the fact our trip had thus far been quite a busy one, we were rather glad of this fact! We once again made full use of the breakfast facilities at the hotel before setting off, granted at a somewhat more sedate pace than had previously been the case - and perhaps taking the opportunity to eat a little more too ;) it may interest @Chlidonias to hear that we took a leaf from his playbook on this particular morning and pocketed a handful of boiled eggs from the breakfast buffet for subsequent snacking throughout the day!

As has already been discussed, we had already scouted-out the route between the hotel and Artis on the evening of our arrival, and as such were able to reach the zoo promptly and without any problems not long after it opened.

---

Artis

Approximate time taken at collection: 300 minutes.
Zoochatters met: N/A
Target species: Rock Sandpiper, Wreathed Hornbill, Syrian Rock Hyrax

Perhaps one of the recurring themes in my reviews of continental zoological collections over the years is my abiding fondness for statues and other physical artworks depicting wildlife, historical individuals connected to the collection, or indeed unorthodox aspects of the collection in question; these always seem to set the tone for the collection in my mind, especially when positioned at the entrance or nearby. As such I was quite pleased to see the following statue immediately on entering Artis:

full


Artis was rather well-provisioned with statues and artwork of this nature, as it happens; perhaps my favourite was the following statue of a giraffe which was - paradoxically enough - positioned between the bird house and reptile house :p

full


As regards my discussion of our visit to Artis, the following seems the best way to tackle matters; first, I shall highlight aspects I particularly liked, followed by those aspects I thought were poor. These will each be discussed in roughly-chronological order - to wit, rather than being arranged in any kind of ranking from best to worst, I will discuss things in more or less the order we saw them. Finally, I will write a paragraph or two summarising my thoughts and feelings about Artis as a whole. This review is being written without reading any of my prior planning and notes from August regarding what precisely I intended to say, and will be posted as soon as it is completed - I'm writing in this particular fashion in the hope it will help me break through the cobwebs formed by the months I have spent away from this thread, but I acknowledge it will almost certainly mean I omit to discuss things which I had originally aimed to highlight :p as such, PLEASE ask questions about anything you would like discussed!

One of the first exhibit complexes we looked at - and also one of the ones we liked best - was the interlinked pair of houses with exterior aviaries which comprised the bird house and rainforest walkthrough; naturally before entering the houses themselves we took careful note of the aforementioned exterior aviaries and their inhabitants, especially given the fact that we were given to understand that one of these contained the first potential lifetick species of the day, the Rock Sandpipers which had arrived at Artis a year or so previously. Frustratingly, not only were these not in evidence but all signage for the species had been removed; however, the aviaries nonetheless contained a fairly good range of oddities and treasures, including the second target species of the day - Wreathed Hornbill (Rhyticeros undulatus). The aviaries themselves were quite attractively designed, retaining a lot of the old-fashioned character which I am rather fond of whilst still providing the inhabitants plenty of space and - even in the grip of midwinter - vegetation providing scope to move around and even escape from public view to some extent. It is worth noting here that the exterior exhibits for the rainforest house - which followed on from these aviaries more or less seamlessly - were of very similar design, increasing the sense that although theoretically two distinct houses linked by an indoor corridor, the exhibit is best viewed as a single entity.

full


On entering the house itself, the first portion seen was the rainforest walkthrough itself; a very attractive and spacious pair of rooms with vegetation on either side of - and above - a central path, feeling very much as if we were walking through a 19th century conservatory; perhaps the closest comparison I can draw is to some of the botanical exhibits found at Wilhelma in Stuttgart. Given how much I enjoyed said collection, it is perhaps only natural that I found myself rather taken with this exhibit.

full


The inhabitants of this walkthrough were all permitted to roam freely, and comprised the following species:

Seba's Short-tailed Bat (Carollia perspicillata)
Rodriguez Flying Fox (Pteropus rodricensis)
White-faced Saki (Pithecia pithecia)
Tokay Gecko (Gekko gecko)
Northern Treeshrew (Tupaia belangeri)
Linnaeus' Two-toed Sloth (Choloepus didactylus)
Pygmy Marmoset (Cebuella pygmaea)
Grey-handed Night Monkey (Aotus lemurinus griseimembra)
New Guinea Ground Cuscus (Phalanger gymnotis leucippus)
Northern Sugar Glider (Petaurus breviceps ariel)
South American Green Iguana (Iguana iguana iguana)
Chinese Water Dragon (Physignathus cocincinus)

As one might expect from this list of species - several of which are reclusive, nocturnal or both - and the size of the walkthrough, patience was very much required in order to fully appreciate the exhibit and spot many of the inhabitants, although predictably the White-faced Saki was active and visible immediately. However, with the exception of the Northern Sugar Glider and the two reptile taxa we were actually able to spot everything eventually; in point of fact, the group of night monkeys and the ground cuscus were remarkably easy to spot, with the former active and visible in fits and spurts, and the latter sleeping in plain view on the top of a nestbox. One particular animal held within this exhibit which I have not mentioned in the above list, but which I was rather interested in hopefully spotting, was an unusual callitrichid hybrid, born of a pairing between Pygmy Marmoset and Geoffroy's Marmoset. However, despite at least 10 minutes of watching the marmosets running throughout the exhibit I found myself struggling to locate the individual in question, until Helly remarked that one marmoset was rather confiding and looked a little odd. Sure enough, she had spotted the hybrid marmoset without even attempting to do so :p

full


Another aspect of Artis with which I was particularly taken was the savannah exhibit - a relatively recent addition, to the best of my knowledge, and one which occupied a reasonably large proportion of the collection's footplan as a whole; this comprised large and spacious exhibits for Indian Elephant (Elephas maximus indicus) and non-subspecific Asian Elephant (Elephas maximus) on one side of a central pathway which descended under the level of a dividing waterway, and Reticulated Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata), Grevy's Zebra (Equus grevyi), Greater Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), South African Ostrich (Struthio camelus australis) and Helmeted Guineafowl (Numida meleagris).

full


full


I really liked this way of dividing the two exhibits, achieving a similar effect to that obtained with the use of hahas in other collections and giving the impression of a single seamless exhibit. Moreover, I thought that the exhibits themselves were quite attractive and provided plenty of space for the inhabitants; the smaller and quite obviously older portions of the exhibits immediately neighbouring the elephant and giraffe houses were less appealing to the eye, naturally, but still served their purpose pretty well considering the space considerations which a city centre collection without any scope for expansion must always contend with.

We also particularly enjoyed the Aquarium building, which was attractively designed and one of the more attractive zoo aquariums I have seen from an architectural point of view; here, it seems appropriate to note the fact that the historical legacy of Artis has not been neglected, with informational signage in many areas of the collection discussing old buildings and exhibits, and other areas where the feel and character of these old exhibits has been retained or replicated wherever possible. The previously-discussed bird house and rainforest walkthrough are, as already noted, a good example of the latter; similarly, the Aquarium was a good example of the former, with informational plaques such as the following displayed on the exterior of the building:

full


The interior of the Aquarium building was no less attractive, with well-designed and good looking displays interspersed with fossil exhibits and - in one particular case - a diorama containing a variety of taxidermy specimens which depicted the fauna and flora of a Dutch coastal sand-dune habitat. Moreover, there was a rather decent selection of oddities displayed within, especially in the set of exhibits devoted to amphibian species where such species as Common Spadefoot Toad (Pelobates fuscus fuscus), Iberian Sharp-ribbed Newt (Pleurodeles waltl) and Mediterranean Treefrog (Hyla meridionalis) could be found. The high standard of signage throughout Artis - already touched upon above - continued within the Aquarium, with displays such as the following informational board discussing how the basement of the Aquarium building - designed to resemble a crypt - is used as the hub of all water filtration and circulation for the structure as a whole:

full


Other aspects of the collection I think are particularly worthy of positive note - and which I'd be happy to discuss at more length if questioned on the subject - included the following:

  • The reptile house - this contained a wide range of oddities in pleasant and well-designed vivariums, although the central exhibit for Sunda Gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) was quite poor in comparison to other exhibits for this species which I have seen in the past.
  • The insect house, which was perhaps the second or third most speciose such exhibit I had seen to this point in time behind those at London and Bristol.
  • The exhibit for Alpine Ibex (Capra ibex) - although nothing astounding, I have always had a soft spot for caprine exhibits when achieved in a simple and attractive fashion whilst providing the inhabitants plenty of opportunity to display their adroit climbing abilities.
full

  • The rough complex of aviaries which comprised the pheasantry; these were designed along similar lines to the external aviaries surrounding the previously-discussed bird house and rainforest walkthrough.

full


However, not all of the exhibits at Artis were good - in point of fact, we reached one of the worst quite early in our wanderings around the collection; a very small and shabby exhibit for non-subspecific Lion (Panthera leo) which was perhaps the second-worst exterior enclosure we had seen for the species after a rather similar one located at Tierpark Hellabrunn in Germany.

full


Of course, this is where the space constraints incumbent on Artis as a city centre collection should be particularly borne in mind; as it stands there seems little space for this exhibit to be expanded, nor for a new exhibit to be constructed elsewhere, but nonetheless this is a challenge which will need to be tackled, and sooner rather than later if the collection intends to retain the species. However, in my eyes there is one exhibit which requires attention much more urgently, so inadequate for purpose and ugly as it is; the housing for the group of non-subspecific Common Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and a single Eastern Common Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) located roughly between the Aquarium and Gorilla House.

The third area which requires specific mention as a low point for Artis is the small mammal house and surrounding exhibits which are roughly located in the centre of the collection; these are perhaps some of the most neglected-looking enclosures in the zoo as a whole, and one of the (fortunately) few cases where the original structures and exhibit footplans seem to have acted as a detriment rather than something which enhances the "feel" of the exhibit. Even the presence of oddities such as Syrian Rock Hyrax (Procavia capensis syriacus) and Yucatan Margay (Leopardus wiedii yucatanicus) could not save the small mammal house from feeling somewhat forgotten and left behind, much as I was pleased to be able to obtain better photographs of the former taxon than I had previously achieved. This is not to say, of course, that all of the older exhibits in this area were poor or had failed to maintain the required level of standards; many merely looked a little shabby, whilst some - such as the island exhibit for Japanese Macaque (Macaca fuscata) were actually pretty good!

full


To be honest, the key issue facing Artis is the same one which other city centre collections such as Bristol, London and Zoo Berlin have faced; how best to balance the constraints of space, the welfare of the animals displayed, a desire to develop new and exciting exhibits and the benefits of retaining the unique feel and look which the collection has developed over the generations. Overall, I feel that Artis has managed to strike this balance pretty well; certainly I believe that as things stand it is a much better city centre collection than London, with developments which have enhanced and respected the existing feel of the collection without feeling like unnatural impositions - as the recent Tiger and Lion developments at the latter collection have done - and a significantly lower number of empty or run-down exhibits than can be found at London. For the purposes of this discussion, Zoo Berlin is perhaps too large to be directly comparable despite the fact it *has* faced many of the same challenges - but Bristol Zoo is definitely a good comparison, and is probably the UK collection which is closest in general feel to Artis in my opinion.

full


Along with the aforementioned balance between modernity and retaining the character of the collection, the good quality of informational displays throughout the collection and the high number of statues and other such decorative artwork, one of the more subtle aspects of Artis which I particularly enjoyed was, put quite simply, how attractive it was; even in the depths of midwinter, the paths throughout the collection were well-vegetated and I can fully imagine that in the summer months, this particular aspect is enhanced even further. On the whole, then, although when compared to the oddities and cutting-edge exhibitry to be found at Burger's Zoo the day before Artis was in a rather less-competitive lane, we enjoyed it almost as much.... in a more low-key, relaxed fashion :)

-----

After leaving Artis at about 14:30, we decided to once again explore Amsterdam a little - taking advantage of the daylight hours to see things from a somewhat different perspective to that obtained some nights previously.

full


Our main priority was to revisit the Dam Square in order to see the Koninklijk Paleis Amsterdam in better light, and to get photographs of the Nationaal Monument located there; the latter is the main memorial in Amsterdam to those who lost their lives in World War II, with the design drawing attention to the working class and intelligentsia who participated in the resistance along with the victims of battle or genocide, and the monument itself incorporating a dozen urns containing soil from burial grounds and/or mass execution sites from eleven of the Dutch provinces, along with the Dutch East Indies (modern-day Indonesia).

full


full


After walking through the city for a time, we returned to the hotel and deposited our bags and cameras in our room before - after resting for a short time - leaving once again in order to make our way to a promising-looking pancake restaurant we had seen near the Westerkerk on our travels:

Best Pancakes Amsterdam - enjoy more than 30 pancakes

After a filling and satisfying meal, we once again retired to our room for the night, ready for our trip to Rotterdam the following morning.

(Coming up: Battle-Khaki Personality (With Red Underwear))
 
Just to repeat my remark in the above review - any questions about anything I haven't covered, or only touched upon, are more than welcome.... and will hopefully help me to continue getting the hang of writing these reviews once again :p
 
I think you mean Hagenbeck rather than Hellabrun for the small lion exhibit?

Like you I really liked the sunken walkway through the megafauna exhibits; in fact I would assume that over the next few years we will see this feature appearing in more European zoos in even more imaginative ways.

One exhibit that you didn't mention that I really enjoyed was that of the North American porcupine, which I think was on the outside of the rainforest house?

Overall I found Artis to be a very competent zoo, but somehow lacking in the totally subjective x-factor that makes a place special. I could totally see how someone could love it, but it just didn't quite do it for me. So much so in fact that I would seriously consider not revisiting when I finally do a proper lowlands trip, given that it is rather expensive if I recall correctly.

Good to see you back on the writing train by the way!
 
An engaging review of Artis and a joy to read...as always! Did you find that 5 hours was easily enough time to view all of the zoological treasures within Amsterdam? I've heard conflicting reports on the average length of stay for other zoo nerds but it seems as if you went at a leisurely pace and found "300 minutes" to be more than sufficient. However, I'm guessing that this was not your debut visit, right?
 
I think you mean Hagenbeck rather than Hellabrun for the small lion exhibit?

Nope; the Hagenbeck one is also pretty damn bad but squeaks into third place on the basis that it does at least *look* interesting and contributes to the overall panorama effect of that portion of the collection, whilst the Hellabrunn one is ugly and (like the Artis exhibit) is basically just a muddy island.

full


To be honest, the three exhibits are all pretty much equally bad, just in slightly different ways :P

Overall I found Artis to be a very competent zoo, but somehow lacking in the totally subjective x-factor that makes a place special. I could totally see how someone could love it, but it just didn't quite do it for me. So much so in fact that I would seriously consider not revisiting when I finally do a proper lowlands trip, given that it is rather expensive if I recall correctly.

Yeah, that is perhaps the way I felt about it - certainly of the big three Dutch collections I visited on the trip it is the one I feel the least inclination to revisit in a hurry. It perhaps suffered slightly in my mind from having been visited between these two collections, to be fair - but perhaps the best comparison I can make in terms of how the place made me feel is Blackpool Zoo, a competent and pleasant zoo which somehow has never grabbed me in the way Chester, Bristol or Cotswold Wildlife Park have.

One exhibit that you didn't mention that I really enjoyed was that of the North American porcupine, which I think was on the outside of the rainforest house?

Quite a nice exhibit, yes - I think this is one of the ones which might have suffered slightly from having been viewed during the winter months, as it struck me as a little muddy and lacking in vegetation.

Did you find that 5 hours was easily enough time to view all of the zoological treasures within Amsterdam? I've heard conflicting reports on the average length of stay for other zoo nerds but it seems as if you went at a leisurely pace and found "300 minutes" to be more than sufficient. However, I'm guessing that this was not your debut visit, right?

Oh, more than enough time :) given the fact that timespan includes revisiting several areas in order to take further photographs of particular species and exhibits, and the collection itself covers quite a small area relatively speaking.

It was my debut visit, as a matter of fact :) the trip I am writing about was my very first to the Low Countries.
 
An engaging review of Artis and a joy to read...as always! Did you find that 5 hours was easily enough time to view all of the zoological treasures within Amsterdam? I've heard conflicting reports on the average length of stay for other zoo nerds but it seems as if you went at a leisurely pace and found "300 minutes" to be more than sufficient. However, I'm guessing that this was not your debut visit, right?

That does however exclude Micropia where you should spend at least one hour, if not longer....
 
Just out of curiousity : why was the Wreathed hornbill at Artis one of your target-species ? It's kept at at least 17 European collections ( 4 of which are in the Netherlands - and a fifth if we count Wisbroek ).
Took care for it at Walsrode and bred it very succesfully at Gettorf ( both Germany, so I'm also very intrested in this species but I don't see a reason to make it a target-species.
Speckled cape tortoise ( padloper ) and Guatemalan spiny-tailed iguana ( with each 3 European keepers ) would be more obvious target-species IMO.
 
Just out of curiousity : why was the Wreathed hornbill at Artis one of your target-species ? It's kept at at least 17 European collections ( 4 of which are in the Netherlands - and a fifth if we count Wisbroek ).
Took care for it at Walsrode and bred it very succesfully at Gettorf ( both Germany, so I'm also very intrested in this species but I don't see a reason to make it a target-species.

Put quite simply - I'd never seen one before :P which I think is a pretty good reason all round!

Speckled cape tortoise ( padloper ) and Guatemalan spiny-tailed iguana ( with each 3 European keepers ) would be more obvious target-species IMO.

As Jake notes, these *were* secondary targets on the level of "nice to see again" but as species which I had seen before (at Plzen and Zoo Berlin respectively) and photographed well, they weren't at the same level as Rock Sandpiper and Wreathed Hornbill (lifetick species) or Syrian Rock Hyrax (seen but poorly photographed).

By the by, at the time of my visit to Artis the padloper was kept only here and at Plzen.
 
Part VIII: Battle-Khaki Personality (With Red Underwear)


After our now-standard hearty breakfast - and a quick look at the weather forecast in order to guage just how thickly-clothed it would be advisable to be for the coming day - we made our way to our train the next morning. We had paid a small supplement in order to be able to catch the faster express service between Amsterdam and Rotterdam, and hence ensure we reached the zoo for opening time given the fact we had been given to understand that it would be likely to fill an entire day.


On arrival into Rotterdam Centraal, it was merely a short 15 minute walk in order to reach Diergaarde Blijdorp; a pleasant-enough walk, although inferior to those of the preceding days in Amsterdam and Arnhem in terms of how scenic the surroundings were. However, we did find ourselves slightly regretting how quickly we had reached the zoo on arrival, as we still had 10 minutes or so to wait before the ticket kiosks would open and it became rapidly apparent that there was a certain damp, windy chill in the air which presaged rain.


full



Diergaarde Blijdorp


Approximate time taken at collection: 420 minutes.

Zoochatters met: N/A

Target species: Swift Fox, Hawksbill Turtle, Black-and-Rufous Sengi


The first, and most important thing that must be said before I start this review is to note one caveat which applies to all that follows; Diergaarde Blijdorp was by far the collection most affected by the fact we visited the Netherlands in winter of all those we were to see, with large portions of the animal collection confined indoors and the outdoor exhibits correspondingly empty. Worse still, the bird flu precautions in place across European collections at the time were being enforced particularly strongly here, with many species off-show entirely. As such, we were unable to appreciate the collection at its best, and hence my views and conclusions should be taken in that light.


full



The first thing we saw on entering the zoo was the former Rivièrahal, which as has been widely-discussed elsewhere is now very much a shade of what it once was, containing as it does an indoor soft play area with an adjacent row of tropical greenhouses, with very few of the treasures which were once present within. However, looking for the various bird species - both free-flying and within aviaries - located within the thickly-vegetated greenhouses made as good a place as any to start with, and more importantly also provided a chance for us to warm up a little! This area was pleasant enough, with oddities such as Western Plantain-eater (Crinifer piscator) and Wreathed Hornbill (Rhyticeros undulatus) within, but seemed a little neglected and forgotten; certainly it was a little tucked-away and would be easy to miss if one were unaware of its existence and hence dismissed the building as purely a soft play area. Only a handful of old signs from historic exhibits located in the corridor leading to the greenhouses hinted at the prior heights of the Rivièrahal.


full



On leaving this area we decided to investigate the neighbouring interior housing for Western Lowland Gorilla and White-naped Mangabey, thinking that we would cut through here into the connected Rhinoceros House; however here we reached the first major point at which the cold weather would interfere with our visit, as the automatic doors into the aforementioned house were locked. Signage on these doors indicated that when the inhabitants of the house were confined indoors due to the weather, visitor access was prevented in the name of animal welfare. As such, we were only able to obtain the briefest glimpses through the doors into the interior stalls for Pygmy Hippopotamus and - a little further on - Eastern Black Rhinoceros. However, our detour was not entirely wasted - within the Gorilla House we found a handful of peepholes which we had been alerted about in advance, allowing a view into a semi-offshow enclosure for Black-and-Rufous Sengi (Rhynchocyon petersi). This represented the first lifetick species of the day, and although we knew the species was exhibited rather more openly elsewhere in the collection we were glad to have seen it here nonetheless. Unfortunately, the gorilla and mangabey housing itself was quite sparse and poor - resembling a cross between a hospital ward and the old ape house at Wilhelma in Stuttgart - and we hence spent little further time in this building.


The bulk of Diergaarde Blijdorp can be roughly divided into four segments for the purposes of discussion; an Asian themed area, an African themed area, the Oceanium and the surrounding New World area - this being more or less the order in which we made our way around the collection. As such, from this point on I will discuss my thoughts on each area before summarising my feelings about Diergaarde Blijdorp as a whole.


full



One of the first areas of the Asian zone which we reached was the Aziehuis; for all intents and purposes a pretty solid reptile house - holding species such as Komodo Dragon (Varanus komodoensis) and Indian Cobra (Naja naja) in spacious and well-designed exhibits - which also contained a handful of nocturnal exhibits for small mammals such as Balabac Chevrotain (Tragulus nigricans) and Northern Dryzone Slender Loris (Loris lydekkerianus nordicus), along with indoor housing for Lion-tailed Macaque (Macaca silenus). The latter of these wasn't terribly great, although perfectly adequate for the purpose at hand, but otherwise I rather liked the exhibits within the Aziehuis both in terms of the enclosure design, signage quality and the selection of species displayed.


full



On the whole I quite liked the exhibit standard within the Asian zone; many of the enclosures we came across comprised paddocks which were spacious but relatively simple in design, and rather resembled a cross between those found at Chester Zoo and Tierpark Berlin to my eyes. Dotted between these were exhibits which followed one of three general designs; rocky little interior grottos surrounded by small exterior enclosures as illustrated by the exhibits for Fishing Cat and Pallas Cat, larger and more thickly-vegetated exhibits for species such as Amur Leopard, and more open island exhibits providing a high level of climbing opportunities for species such as the aforementioned Lion-tailed Macaque, Sulawesi Crested Macaque and Red Panda. Given the fact that the cold temperature meant that the moats and pools surrounding these island exhibits were near-uniformly frozen over, it was perhaps unsurprising that the inhabitants of these appeared to have been prevented from having outside access. As such we were unable to judge the quality of these enclosures in action, as we could for the other exhibits in this area, but nonetheless I think they were quite well-suited to the needs of the species they housed. Here would possibly be a good opportunity to observe that Blijdorp represented yet another collection which provides high-quality physical artwork and statues as additional decoration for many of the exhibits - and as such hits on one of my personal soft spots - given the fact that both Helly and myself were rather amused by a particularly worried-looking statue positioned next to the Red Panda exhibit :p


full



Beyond here were a handful of more stand-alone exhibits; unfortunately a large walkthrough exhibit for South-East Asian bird species - which contains, as I understand, quite a good selection of avian oddities - was closed due to the aforementioned bird flu precautions, and as such I cannot comment further on this area. Similarly, my views on the exterior exhibits for a mixed group of non-subspecific Asian Elephant and pure Indian Elephant (Elephas maximus indicus) on one side of the Taman Indah house, and Indian Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) on the other side, are necessarily limited by the fact that the inhabitants of these enclosures were confined indoors due to the temperature and hence - much like the aforementioned island exhibits - we did not see them in their full context. However, they seemed pretty good all things considered, if a little muddy and on the smaller side of acceptable. We were able to view the inhabitants of these exhibits within the Taman Indah house itself, which was themed to look akin to the overgrown and thickly-vegetated ruins of an abandoned Asian temple; the interior exhibit for the elephant herd struck me as rather better quality than did the nearby rhinoceros exhibit, both in terms of size and general design. I rather liked this house on the whole, however, and the theming within seemed to work where many other exhibits themed around the concept of Asian temples fall short, either through seeming tacky and overblown or distractingly artificial; the only downside to the house was that given how spacious and well-vegetated the visitor spaces were, it was disappointing for the opportunity to stock it with free-flying birds in a similar fashion to Tropical Realm at Chester Zoo to be entirely missed, particularly given the fact that in some ways I felt aspects of Taman Indah resembled the aforementioned exhibit writ small.


full



After viewing the Siberian Tiger exhibit briefly - large and spacious, and well-designed for the needs of the inhabitants as far as we could tell given the fact that (once again) they were invisible - we made our way towards the African zone; this was by far the area which suffered worst for being viewed during the winter months, given the fact that as far as we could tell almost every single outdoor species within this area was confined indoors and, barring a handful of exceptions where the interior housing was accessible- therefore invisible :p this was particularly unfortunate given the fact that judging by appearances, this portion of Diergaarde Blijdorp is also the one with the best outdoor exhibits of all, barring one highlight exhibit elsewhere which will be highlighted in due course. As such, if anything will draw me back to the collection in the coming years at a more clement time of year, it will be the opportunity to see this area of the zoo as it should be seen. This said, I will endeavour to address the particular highlights of the African zone as far as is possible.


The first major highlight we reached was the house for Okapi (Okapia johnstoni) - this comprised a spacious interior exhibit for several individuals, along with several free-flying bird species, alongside a very large and well-vegetated exterior paddock which was netted-over to permit access for not only the Okapi themselves, but also the various bird taxa which shared their indoor housing. This latter exhibit had, I believe, been converted from an existing enclosure for waterfowl and wading birds native to the Netherlands - as such I think this represented a very good example of adapting and modifying an exhibit whilst keeping something of the character of what had come before. Unfortunately, neither the Okapi nor the birds were using this portion of their exhibit at the time of our visit - a pity, as I think in the summer months this could well rank among the very best exhibits for Okapi I have seen, given how impressed I was with an empty exhibit in winter! I was also very pleased with the standard of informational signage within this exhibit complex, with detailed information given about each individual Okapi living within - including, in a touch I wish more exhibits for this species would consider, photographs of their unique rear stripe patterns; this naturally allows the visiting public to identify a given individual when viewing them.


full



The path leading around the perimeter of this exterior exhibit made its way up a ramp into the crocodile house which is positioned behind and above the off-display interior housing for the Okapi group; this was yet another highlight of the Africa zone, along with one of the only aspects which I was able to judge fully given the fact that it was entirely indoors and hence unaffected by the winter months. An initial antechamber containing a number of solid reptile and invertebrate exhibits - along with a pair of exhibits for Black-and-Rufous Sengi - was immediately followed by a wooden boardwalk leading through the bulk of the house; to the left were large exhibits for both non-subspecific and pure Western Nile Crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus chamses) and Slender-snouted Crocodile (Mecistops cataphractus), whilst on the right-hand side a number of exhibits designed along the general theme of African scrub and semi-desert contained species such as Rock Hyrax, Meerkat and Cape Porcupine. Given the amount of mock-rock crags and outcrops within these exhibits I strongly suspected that this was the enclosure that had held Klipspringer until relatively recently - a suspicion which was confirmed in conversation with @ShonenJake13 some days later, as it happens.


full



We exited the crocodile house onto a boardwalk leading towards the Savannehuis; a gigantic construction fashioned - as far as I could tell - to resemble the stump of a baobab tree, and which served as the indoor housing for the various species which inhabited the surrounding African savannah exhibits, including Reticulated Giraffe, Greater Kudu and Chapman’s Zebra. Looking down into the interior of the house, it seemed spacious and well-designed, although only the interior housing for the giraffes was visible as far as I could tell. All inhabitants of the exhibit seemed to be locked indoors, with the large and rather attractive savannah paddock therefore standing empty. As I have noted already, this was quite a pity as I think this exhibit would stand as one of the highlights of the zoo as a whole when viewed in-use and during more clement weather. Smaller exhibits for species such as Spotted Hyena, Serval and Mantled Guereza were located beyond here; the hyena exhibit looked reasonably good, if a little small, and appeared to be undergoing renovation work at the time of our visit, whilst the serval enclosure comprised a solid if plain paddock similar to those present in the Asian zone. The Guereza exhibit was the best of the three in my opinion, with large quantities of climbing frames, ropes and other such items throughout both the indoor and exterior enclosures; perhaps unsurprisingly the inhabitants of the enclosure were remaining indoors and huddling together for warmth!


full



We next reached the third major highlight of the African zone – a massive walkthrough exhibit for a variety of vultures, raptors and other large African birds, containing the following species:

African White-backed Vulture (Gyps africanus)

Black Kite (Milvus migrans migrans)

Hooded Vulture (Necrosyrtes monachus)

Rueppel’s Griffon Vulture (Gyps rueppelli rueppelli)

White-headed Vulture (Trigonoceps occipitalis)

Marabou Stork (Leptoptilos crumenifer)

Hamerkop (Scopus umbretta)

Blue Crane (Anthropoides paradise)


Unfortunately, although access was not blocked to the aviary itself, it was entirely devoid of inhabitants minus one or two wild birds – which leads me to suspect that much like the walkthrough aviary within the Asian zone the inhabitants had been moved off-display due to the bird flu quarantine precautions. However, I could nonetheless see that this was a very impressive exhibit indeed, possibly of a size with the gigantic vulture aviary present at Tierpark Berlin but much more open, comprising as it did an aviary backing onto fence and mesh rather than the mock-rock cliffs clinging to the walls of the Alfred-Brehm Haus as the Berlin exhibit does.


Our route through the zoo shortly-thereafter took us underneath a set of railway bridges into the newer half of the collection, within which could be found the New World zone and the Oceanium; although strictly speaking were we to view things in a logical order, it would make more sense for us to view the various portions of the New World zone before visiting the Oceanium, given the fact that the chilly air was started to be scattered with sleet we decided that retreating somewhere warm and allowing time for the skies to clear somewhat would be preferable. As such we started walking briskly towards the entrance of the Oceanium, which frustratingly entailed walking around much of the perimeter of the structure – including a one-way exit – before reaching our destination. However, we did make a single detour; this was in order to hopefully pick up the next major lifetick species of the day, Swift Fox (Vulpes velox) - the outdoor exhibit for which was located outside the Oceanium roughly halfway to the entrance.


full



Given the fact that we had been given to understand that this species would be leaving the collection imminently, there was some level of trepidation as I approached the area where I had been informed the exterior exhibit for the species was located. However, not only was I gratified to note that the enclosure we discovered was still signposted for the taxon, but moreover despite the chilly weather - and the fact that it was gently snowing by this point in time - both individuals were highly active and visible. As such, we were able to obtain very good views of this species and stood observing and photographing them for some time before continuing towards the Oceanium. I was struck by the fact that in both appearance and behaviour, it seemed that Swift Fox resembled nothing so much as a slightly smaller and more gracile Corsac Fox!


On approaching the Oceanium, we first saw a relatively good – if bare – outdoor pool for the California Sealion group present at the collection; as no feeding displays nor talks were taking place anytime soon, the inhabitants were only sporadically visible and we quickly moved on to the first major exhibit of the Oceanium itself. Next to the entrance of the building, a covered viewing area looked onto a collection of mock-rock cliffs and stone platforms which overlooked a deep pool; this exhibit was intended to provide a representation of Bass Rock in Scotland, and the seabird colonies which nest there, containing as it did Common Guillemot (Uria aalge), Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica) and, in an odd break in biogeography, Pacific Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla pollicaris). I rather liked this exhibit, perhaps because of my fondness for auks and other seabirds developed through years of living near the Northumberland coastline and hence easy access to the Farne Islands, but it should be noted that the viewing windows were somewhat difficult to see through, due to a combination of salt-staining, condensation and scratches on the glass.

full


I’m not the best at writing about aquarium exhibits – I enjoy them, certainly, but for whatever reason I tend to find it difficult to recall specific details about them subsequently and even more difficult to put my thoughts into words; as such this portion of my review will be a little more sparse than what has come beforehand. It must be said that I was rather taken with the Oceanium as a whole, feeling that it compared very strongly to the Ocean complex at Burgers which I had viewed some days prior, and that the reptile, amphibian and mammal exhibits within were by-and-large consistently good if a little bland.


full



However, other than the aforementioned Bass Rock exhibit there were three other particular aspects which I specifically liked:


  • The massive main tank in the Atlantic zone of the Oceanium, which contained dozens of sub-tropical sharks, rays and other fish, along with two species of sea turtle; Green Turtle and – yet another target lifetick for the day – Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata). The tank was viewed via a large and spacious acrylic glass tunnel passing underneath, which was far the superior of anything found at a SeaLife or Bluereef Aquarium.
  • I was rather taken with the viewing area for the Galapagos Tortoises held at the collection, themed as it was to resemble Charles Darwin’s study within the Beagle.
  • A Caribbean beach tank, which contained a large quantity of Cownose Ray, a species which I am rather fond of.

On leaving the Oceanium, we made our way through the various New World exhibits which comprised the remainder of the “new” half of Diergaarde Blijdorp. These can be roughly split into two categories; the North American exhibits, which were largely rather good, and the South American exhibits which – barring one example which I shall discuss anon – seemed a little worn and neglected compared to much of the collection we had viewed earlier, strangely enough when one considers the fact that these included some of the newer exhibits within the zoo.

full


By far the best outdoor exhibit within the New World zone was the large, sprawling complex of enclosures for Polar Bear – certainly in the top five exhibits for the species which I had been fortunate enough to see at the time of my visit, and with only those at Yorkshire Wildlife Park and Highland Wildlife Park indisputably superior. Nearby exhibits for Arctic Fox and Plains Bison were also pretty good, as was the near-mandatory enclosure for Black-tailed Prairie Dog; the latter of these is worthy of particular mention, given the fact that it comprised a walkthrough exhibit and – despite the presence of high walls and mesh grates aiming to keep the inhabitants confined – I noted with wry amusement that there were just as many individuals present beyond the exhibit as there were within!

full


The centrepiece of the South American portion of this area was the Amazonica house; more or less a large walkthrough butterfly house dotted with terrariums for amphibians and reptiles, with a central pond containing several species of Amazonian freshwater fish and Arrau River Turtle. I really liked this exhibit, which in many ways reminded me somewhat of the Mangrove house at Burgers – although for obvious reasons the vegetation within was much thicker and more mature than it had been in the latter exhibit, and as such it perhaps serves as a glimpse towards what form it may take in another decade or so. As a general rule I am not a massive fan of butterfly houses – I have perhaps visited the one at Chester Zoo once or twice in the last five years, despite having been to the collection in question well over a dozen times in this time period – but I am nonetheless able to appreciate one done on this scale, with a high standard of signage throughout and with massive areas devoted to the purpose at hand. However, as already noted the remaining portions of the South American zone were somewhat shabbier and less-impressive, perhaps representing some of the poorest portions of the collection – this said, I am given to understand that this is the area of Blijdorp which is slated to next undergo refurbishment and renovations, with at least some of the species in this area (Maned Wolf, for instance) departing the collection in the imminent future. Moroever , it must also be noted that this was yet another area of the collection which suffered badly for the time of year, with empty, muddy exhibits and a pair of large walkthrough aviaries yet again barred from access due to the bird flu precautions.

After making our way to the restaurant located at one end of the old Rivierahal to get a quick bite to eat and a hot drink – quite pleasant and affordably-priced as such places go, and located in what would certainly be a scenic point in the zoo, overlooking as it did a massive waterfowl lake – all that remained to us was to revisit those portions of the collection which we wanted to view anew; the aforementioned waterfowl lake was devoid of all but seagulls, thanks to the bird flu regulations confining the inhabitants off-display, so at this stage we had seen everything at least once. Revisits focused on the Asiehuis and the Crocodile House, representing as they did the main two locations where interior exhibits would hopefully reward repeat viewing of species we wanted better views of, but we more or less wandered throughout the entire site at least once, in the hope that a few more species may have been permitted outdoor access by this point in the day.


Here would be a good point to give some brief overall thoughts on Diergaarde Blijdorp in conclusion; despite the cold weather and quarantine regulations rather hampering our visit, we nonetheless thoroughly enjoyed the collection. In many ways it reminded me of Chester Zoo; certainly it was the continental collection which I feel is closest in style and atmosphere to said collection, although by and large there were few areas which excelled in the way that Chester does. As already noted, we liked the way in which the regional theming and historical information signage at the collection was achieved, with the latter particularly meriting mention. Similar to my penchant for animal statues at a collection, I think it is very important for an old historical collection to retain some of the old “feel” it historically held – or at the very least to acknowledge what has come before – and this is something that was paid attention to throughout Blijdorp.

full


To get ahead a little in terms of my discussion of Dutch collections, it is giving little away to note that at the end of the trip which I am discussing, this held a strong second place behind Burgers in my personal ranking of the collections which we had visited – which rather answers the question of where I fall on that thorny question asked of all zoo enthusiasts after they first visit these two collections ;) and whilst I am eager to revisit Burgers on the basis of just how excellent it is, and my desire to see how it develops over the coming years, I am almost as enthusiastic to revisit Diergaarde Blijdorp..... in more warmer weather, so that I can truly judge the quality of the collections and view more than a mere fraction of the exhibits and enclosures in-use!


-----


After leaving the zoo - slightly prior to closing time, as the wind and sleet was picking up somewhat - we hurried back to Rotterdam Centraal in order to catch a train back to Amsterdam as soon as possible. As we had a very early train booked for the next morning, we decided to find somewhere to eat a little earlier than usual and then relax in the hotel room for a time before retiring to bed early. Ultimately, we felt a shade too tired - and loathe to venture out into the cold once again - to stray far, so we decided to take advantage of the fact that our hotel contained a small restaurant and eat on-site. This was quite a good decision, as the food was good and, all things considered, reasonably-priced.


Before retiring to bed, we made final arrangements for our intended meeting of @Vision and @KevinVar at Zoo Antwerp the following morning - the first time we would meet either Zoochatter - and packed our bags as fully as possible to allow for a prompt departure.


(Coming up: Amour Pour Amahoro)
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, although access was not blocked to the aviary itself, it was entirely devoid of inhabitants minus one or two wild birds


full
You say this, yet there is what seems to be one of the two Gyps vultures visible in the shelter in the top right corner of the image. :p

I'm glad you enjoyed Rotterdam. It's sad that you visited at such an unfortunate time of the year, but gives you all the more reason to return! Seems like you were just in time for the Swift foxes, as construction is now fully going on in that particular area, with the maned wolf enclosure already being replaced by a Madagascar-themed aviary for ring-tailed lemurs.
 
Back
Top