I know that your main goal on this forum seems to be to pursue me trying to ridiculize my correct taxonomy and substitute it by your wrong one, but please, could you stop harassing me constantly with the same theme? It ends being a bit boring. I dont harass you because of your taxonomic point of view, so don't do this to others.
By the way, I have photos of all the 10 living + 3 fossil species of
Geochelone, but not everyone as pairs, so the two species that you think can't fit in this thread - for
G. elegans is a lone individual (and it's a very young one, that also can't fit in the thread), and for
G. platynota they're three individuals in same photo.
Any constructive, positive or just non-denigrative comment will be welcome in this thread by any member - and especially appreciated would be your own photos of animal pairs that follows the thread guidelines given in the first message (overall from species not represented here).
Following this, next couples
241.
Granopupa granum
242.
Gromphadorhina oblongonota
243.
Grus leucogeranus (Siberian crane)
244.
Gryllus assimilis (Jamaican field cricket)
245.
Gymnorhina tibicen (Australian magpie)
