Yes, copyrighted works are being used in training images - and a person could theoretically make a custom training set with any set of images they want. I think you could argue the latter is copyright infringement, but the former really feels like it falls under fair use. It's being used for a different purpose than the original (which US courts have ruled count under fair use) and it's one of many thousands of images in the set. It isn't just going to copy someone's imageEvery artist I know is furious with AI art and the companies creating the platform. There are confirmed reports of copyrighted and stolen works being used, and issues with companies not being forefront with the fact they're distributing works to AI use. Several companies have already fired artists and gone to using AI so they don't have to pay salary. It's going over really really badly as a whole.
I am only arguing for the copyright issue here, I totally understand all of the other issues with AI art and think criticism is fair.
I guess, but what your proposed solution be here? Ban it? Seems harsh. The technology exists now, there's no going back, like it or not. It kinds of feels like we just have to accept it at this point.One, just because we have it doesn't mean it's a good thing that should be used.
Two, given I can remember when there were more cassette tapes and vhs tapes than DVDs and CDs, to the point where now most laptops don't even have cd players anymore I kind of disagree with the point in general. Tech marches on at a rather crazy rate and relatively little is around for all that long.
CDs aren't being used much anymore because most people find little use for them. Can you imagine a future now where AI is no longer useful to people? I sure cannot.