It still seems strange to me that there are three potential breeding female snow leopards and that the same male will be bred to two of them. This then decreases the potentials founders as it means that many of the cubs born ion the region will be brothers and sisters. Wouldn't it have been better to have an unrelated male at Melbourne and breed their cubs with the Taronga or Mogo cubs. Three zoos full of siblings will not a breeding program make.
Jay, you might be interested to know that of the seven males in the region, two are considered to be post-reproductive, one is infertile, and one has never bred, and is also considered post-reproductive.
There are a couple of potentially geneticly-transmitted disease issues with this species, and the decision has been made not to continue to breed from animals known to carry and therefore pass on, these diseases. A healthy popualtion of disease-free animals is better than the alternative, I think you'd agree?
Consequently, only one pairing has been recomended for the region this year (at Melbourne Zoo) and all other institutions holding snow leopards have been asked to prevent all other pairings.
The import of additional, unrelated, disease-free animals would be ideal, but as I am sure you would realise, the popoulation overseas is small, some are related to the animals we already hold, some carry the same diseases we have here, and some zoos just don't want to give them up. Importing new animals is not an easy thing, and since the species is managed internationally, we are at the beck and call of the international studbook keeper.
Things are not always as simple as they might seem, I'm afraid.