Has anyone read the comments yet below that post? How could anyone possibly think that people with these sorts of views could be of ANY benefit to the governing of a zoo? I feel sorry for the people at the Toronto Zoo who are actually educated, and now will have to deal with the soon to be (no doubt) ridiculous claims this committee will be making about the quality of the zoo. I don't understand why this is considered a smart move, let the zoo and the people of high education govern itself. Take a look at this comment that was made by someone: "I won't be happy until all the zoos are closed. I am also not happy about the opening of the new Ripley's Aquarium place in Toronto including that they have rare species. Have we not learned from our mistakes with the wonderful Marine Land? Shut them all down." This is the view-point of many people who support ZooCheck, what these people do not realize is the amount of true conservation work and research that zoos actually do.
It is sad, that the city council is so quick to cave into a little bit of pressure from someone who can talk so loudly.....Why not have someone focus on the benefits of zoos for one hour, there are hundreds! The same story over and over again with the same reasons as to why zoos are horrible is getting old.
Sorry for the rant! It just bothers me someday's when people try to talk about things when they start off being biased and never take a moment to really observe the benefits of both sides.
A lot of people that commented on that facebook page seem to hate zoos. I could care less about their opinions.