Ok, I’ve gone through everything, with the exception of the appendices, as in I read everything. Before I get into my opinion on items presented in this Master Plan, I think a couple things should be noted.
Like most of you, I was hoping for more information on smaller scales, like what species would be added and removed. We see exhibit expansions and inclusion of mixed species exhibit, but little to no information on species involved other then same picture we’re all zooming into to make sense of. But, we should remember that this Master Plan is not the only source of development that the zoo is using. This Master Plan is a guided suggestion of a possibility that the zoo can go in. This Master Plan includes the Technology Master Plan and works in conjunction with it. But it also works in conjunction with the
2020-2025 Strategic Plan,
Animal Lives with Purpose Plan, as well as the currently in “Request for Proposal” status
Site Wide Interpretive Communications Master Plan. Together these 5 documents build a truer picture of an overall Master Plan.
So, what this means, to me at least, is that if there’s little to no mention of the Lions, or Hyenas, or Makhor, or even the lack of mention for the Australasia Pavilion, then look to the Animal Plan and take that as the plan moving forward. However, if the Master Plan says something that overrides the Animal Plan, such as the Animal Plan’s action to replace the Indian Rhinos with a larger herbivore or mixed species space, than I’d look to the Master Plan as the deciding factor. So Tigerline it is.
Lastly, the Master Plan made sure to mention that all the names for the newly developed spaces is not final by any means. Names for each area will be decided by the zoo and any partners the zoo works with in completing these projects. So,
@hyena142 and
@TZFan, think of Gorillaland, Wilderness North, and Safari Meander as project names, rather than final names. They could very well be renamed into something much better or far worse.
Ok, now on to the good stuff. What I thought about the Master Plan. Overall, I’m mostly positive to everything. I’m not comparing this to the 2016 Master Plan, because it’s mostly pointless to compare “what could’ve been” to “what’s planned”. So, I’m comparing the current state of the zoo to what’s planned. Once certain projects are started, I’ll then compare those to the overall Master Plan to see what changes were, if any, and why.
Conservation Campus
I love this concept a lot. There’s a ton to go into this over long stretches of time. With Phase 1 being just the Conservation Campus itself and the Otter exhibit, it’s a great improvement. Phase 2 will be years away from Phase 1, but that’s were there’s a lot of potential. I can’t wait to see that take fruition. Love that there’s chance in seeing an Orangutan upon entry.
Indoor Winter Viewing and Holding (Savanna Pavilion)
This looks to be the next big project after the Conservation Campus. It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out. I love the concepts being proposed, but I’m curious as to how they’ll change the exhibit space indoors to a venue area. Anyone who’s been in certain indoor holdings know that there will be a distinctive odor that’s extremely unpleasant to be around. So how would hosting a venue with the possibility of that odor work?
Jaguar Habitat and Waterfall
Phase 1 of this project is mostly to address AODA issues and include a fun way to expand space for the Jaguars. AODA is what it is. Whatever the zoo has to do to remain compliant for disability access they’ll have to do. Creating an additional path is fine in that respect.
The 360 tubes that are presented in multiple projects throughout this plan is something I’m indifferent to. The visuals for them are minimal, so I’m waiting on a more developed idea on how these can look. They look good now, but once built, well, what if they’re an eyesore? I’m sure the zoo will try preventing that, but it’s still a possibility. So, I’m holding out my opinion on all 360 tubes. Also, there was no mention of the Capybaras, so in consulting the Animal Plan, the idea is that they’re rotate spaces with the Flamingos. Doesn’t look like a mixed space will behere, which I don’t mind. Plus, Flamingo apparently don’t play well with other animals, and are suggested to not mix with other species.
Phase 2 is to be completed years later in this plan, and that holds more interest for me, because the design proposed open viewing, which I’d love to see.
Gorillaland
This was interesting to me, because more focus was placed on the indoor exhibits rather than the outdoor exhibits. I thought we’d see a more in-depth plan for what’s to come for the outdoor Gorilla exhibit. Instead, all we got was the idea of a second outdoor exhibit, with not real plan to it. Also, if I’m to understand this 360 tube system, the Gorilla will have potential access to the entire pavilion? Everything about this plan confuses me, and I’m not entirely sold on it. There was almost no mention of other species in the African Pavilion, so I looked at the Animal Plan as the standard on what will happen to those animals.
Saving Species Sanctuary
I like this mostly because it’s not replacing any previously coveted exhibit space. They’re using unused space to help push the messaging of conservation. No real issues on this.
Wilderness North
Thank you for bringing back walking paths. I love it. Couldn’t be happier with that decision. I like a lot of what they’re doing in this area. Decommissioning the Domain was really the right thing to do. But I’m in agreement with a lot of people, as in, why more Caribou exhibits and what’s happening with the Grizzly Bears. The Animals Plan mentions installing a training wall for the Grizzlies, but it doesn’t really indicate with anything beyond that. I have to assume that was an idea for a new exhibit and not down in the Domain since the plan is to close it down. I’m surprised to see the Cougars get such a large exhibit space, which has me wondering if there are plans of breeding the species.
Nutrition Centre and Restaurant
A nice concept. Not something that interests me all that much, but it’s a great idea for a lot of reasons. Great education opportunities for sure.
Americas Pavilion
This was interesting, because despite the extensive facelift, which looks good, the pavilion looks like it’ll be left in a boring state of affairs. From what I can gather, the Otters and Beavers are leaving the Pavilion. The Primate wing will be expanded on, as well as possibly the Alligator exhibit, and focus brought to the Blanding’s Turtle conservation efforts. But at this point, it looks to be missing that wow factor. This is the last big project, so it’ll be interesting to see what changes arise from now to when it’s ready to start planning.
Safari Meander
I like what they want to do here, but this is the last project on the phasing of the plan. Change overtime can definitely take place from now until then. But I like what I see. A lot of this plan I looked to the Animals Plan, because there was no real mention of Lions, Hyenas, Watusi, or animal selection for other areas. I like the Cheetah move and expansion. I feel like they’re getting this for 2 reasons. The zoo has a successful breeding program it can build upon, and a Cheetah run will be better suited in the new space. Seeing the Baboons get an expansion into the old Cheetah exhibit is very interesting, mainly because the Olive Baboons are being phased out. The Animal Plan doesn’t suggest a specific animal replacement, so there is a small chance we might get something other than Baboons there. Especially they’re also looking into improving on off exhibit holding. Lastly, love the idea of a landscape bridge.
Forage Farm
I don’t have anything to say to the Forage Farm, but I can see why the zoo is doing it.
Daycare
Smart placement and great idea. The key to this is finding a worthy partner to team up with in order to get this completed.
Tigerline
This is very interesting to me. I didn’t expect the Sumatran Tigers to replace the Indian Rhinos, which I think will stick around for another 8-10 years at least. That being said, I like what’s proposed. Slowly building the Tiger exhibit space, while phasing out or relocating other animals is smart. When I see enhancements for the Tahr or the Babirusa exhibits, I don’t think what’s the point. I look at that as, they’re readying that space for the Tigers. Let’s call this area what it is. The end game is to create a breeding facility for Sumatran Tigers. The Animal Plan really indicated this as the direction the zoo wants to move to. I’m curious if once Tigerline is complete, will they continue occupying their old exhibit space, or will that be converted into a holding for other species. Because the long tunnel from the old holding remains by the end of everything. No mention of the old exhibit space though.
Zoo Brewery
This confuses me because I was under the impression that the land wasn’t stable, which is why the Mayan Woods is closed. However, we’re looking to slap a large 2-story Brewery here? The plan makes it sound like the issue with the Malayan Woods is mostly, if not solely the building and not the ground it sits on. Either way, the brewery is an interesting idea for sure. Also love the Orangutan touch down space here.
Other Tidbits
Love the proposed idea of a Gondola. Really smart idea getting around some AODA issues. Also, glad to see the Maglev Monorail is still alive. I like having the Biodigestor on zoo grounds. That can really help cut cost on certain elements. Lastly, I like the suggestions that were made in what to look for in seeking partnerships for projects. Really smart and forward thinking.
Conclusion
I think we should take a lot of this with a grain of salt. This is an ambitious guide, and it’s entirely subject to change.
@Zooplantman does bring up a couple interesting points. As they mentioned this is a $322 million plan. However, it’s over a 20-year period, with a lot of focus on partnerships and building a proper fundraising source of income. So, I don’t think it’s entirely impossible to meet project budgets, but it will be a challenge. I’d like to see a lot of this plan implemented, but time will tell.
As for the main consultant on this Master Plan, I don’t think them or any of the other consultants they partnered with have worked on a zoo before. But they have worked on tourist attractions with is the same principle in overall design. Actual exhibit and animal habitat designs will come latter when the projects begin planning phases. So, that’s the point where we will see the most changes made from this Master Plan. When that time comes, we’ll have a better understanding of what to expect. Maybe projects will be scaled back, maybe some will be bolstered. We’ll see.