AI is the wriong way to breed animals, a few zoos makes it to easy by themselfs,oh, we want an elephant byby, but no bull. No problem, AI is the magic word. AI is to stressful for wild animals, especially for giraffes, you can't do it with giraffes without to narkotosize(is that correct, you know what I mean)them, and this is a very big risk for giraffes. I hope, they will never do it with giraffes, they should forbid it to do it with any wild animal in captivity.
Well, let me disagree ...
AI should not be a current way of breeding animals BUT it should be an option, especially when we're dealing with risky populations and endangered species.
AI allows to get females pregnant without streesing animals on shipment - and I supose we all agree, that in most cases, ship is more traumatic and stressfull than AI.
Plus it helps a LOT to increase genetic diversity.
To get an decent AI in a female is NOT necessary to put her down. Animals can be taught to stand while they are inseminated.
Some elephants and other animals do this and is very easy for them.
Giraffes .. well, it should be quite hard, as they're nervous animals, to teach them to stand but not impossible. Also it's quite risky to put a giraffe down, not due narcotics but due their morphology. But, again, it's not a very big issue also - especially when compared to 10 years ago.
Many giraffe are put down to be transported or captured.
So, as stated above I do firmly believe that AI should be an option to certain species under certain needs.
It's not natural, you're right. But it's also not natural to keep them in Zoos or to feed them artifically or to choose their mates and so ...
We are responsible for the animals we keep. Nothing on this is natural and it's we that have to decide what is best for them.
If AI is a way to save them ... bring them on! I'm all in favour!
And one last paragraph .. now that everyone is worried (at last!!) with sub-species, this makes AI even more important!