Last I saw they were still the same as they were when the latest calf was born; mum, dad, two teenage sons and a daughter, the latest calf.
On top: Can they bring in 1-2 more cows for breeding from the Continent?
I guess if they were determined enough. Not sure though where our founders came from. If it is the Indian Subcontinent population all along it should be relatively straight forward. But given the bureaucracy in India it might still take a dogged team willing to enter into negotiating a deal and a workable relationship with Mysore Zoo c.s.Would it be at all possible for LSZ to import some new bloodlines from an Indian zoo or another Asian zoo for the EEP the inbreeding would be high within European the group!
ZSL imported a pair (1.1) some weeks ago!!!Your quite right Kifaru the bureaucracy would be a major problem there. Maybe another outlet via Singapore could be an option?. This may of been the same type of problem London zoo had with the two pairs of Asian lions they were hoping to obtain which appears not to have happened!
ZSL imported a pair (1.1) some weeks ago!!!
Not yet, as in quarantine at Whipsnade. Just read up the Whipsnade 2017 page 1 and the latter bits of the 2016 thread for further details.Thats really good news at least they got hold of one pair, new bloodlines are needed in the EEP. Are they now in the new "Land of the Lions exhibit" at London!
Wonder whether they count only the deer - muntjac and Chinese water deer - as in per collection or those wild on the grounds? Anyone more info?
Both populations of deer were introduced to the zoo grounds by Whipsnade themselves, so they are counted as part of the zoo's collection. There were no wild individuals within their perimeter before introduction by Whipsnade took place.Wonder whether they count only the deer - muntjac and Chinese water deer - as in per collection or those wild on the grounds? Anyone more info?
but they only list 0.0.2 Reeves' Muntjac and 0.0.30 Chinese Water Deer, which suggests they are not counting the wild animals in their inventory.Both populations of deer were introduced to the zoo grounds by Whipsnade themselves, so they are counted as part of the zoo's collection. There were no wild individuals within their perimeter before introduction by Whipsnade took place.
but they only list 0.0.2 Reeves' Muntjac and 0.0.30 Chinese Water Deer, which suggests they are not counting the wild animals in their inventory.
while you were posting I was editing my post to add in that the figures for some other species would suggest they are indeed including the wild exotics. But I wonder if the 0.0.2 for the muntjac is missing a number? It seems wrong.I would suggest they are and that populations of both have just decreased.
while you were posting I was editing my post to add in that the figures for some other species would suggest they are indeed including the wild exotics. But I wonder if the 0.0.2 for the muntjac is missing a number? It seems wrong.