I'm not certain that the forum has been at its best on this issue: a witch hunt against Gill, lots of conjecture about something that probably doesn't need such conjecture, intemperate comments from many when the case is possibly sub judice right now.
I'm not sure that you don't really mean that you don't care why she died; nor do I think that, on reflection, you would think that your comments about the police and Sarah's family are appropriate in their tone.
Might be time for a number of people to count to ten before posting....
I don't care why she died....only that she died. Death for any reason is tragic....more so when an animal is involved.
The only comment I made about Sarah's family was that of course they're going to say it wasn't suicide......nothing wrong there.
My comments about the police are entirely justified. In my experience, they're so wrapped up in politics that anyone who takes what they say to be gospel is incredibly naive. The police probably tell more untruths than genuine fact. Lets not forget they work for a council in a very bleak part of the country, whose only tourist attraction is this zoo.
I suspect a huge cover up (which in hindsight has gone very wrong).....partly to give comfort to Sarah's poor family at what must be a dreadful time, but also to save face for the zoo. I think what really happened should be made more public to help make sure that similar events won't happen again!