jbnbsn99
Well-Known Member
Design 0-20 6
Animal Needs 0-20 8
Visitor Needs 0-20 12
Write-up 0-20 18
Landscaping 0-10 2
Interpretation 0-10 5
51
1. Excellent write up. It could benefit from standardized formatting.
2. It is impossible to gauge how bog or small exhibits are. You mention measurements in the write-up but these no not transfer over to the design.
3. You design itself isn't really a design. It's a vague layout that one might see on a zoo map. It's impossible to tell what's what on the map. There are numbers floating in the air with nothing attached to them.
4. Many of the exhibits are far too small. The raptor aviaries for instance. The biggest aviary is 9 meters long, which I would hope holds the largest bird there the Golden Eagle. The eagle has a 2.5 meter wingspan. The bird will barely be able to move. Same with your wildcat enclosures. A 2 meter square enclose for a cat is almost cruel. That's the size of a large transport crate.
5. Roe dear can easily jump the fence in the area where I have to assume the exhibit is.
6. You have a lot of common native species. For interpretation and ecological reasons, might it be better to have an area where wild animals can come in to the zoo? Bird feeders, naturally planted areas, etc. and have those areas with signs/guides pointing out what might be seen. The rarer chance of seeing a wild animal in a zoo is far more rewarding that seeing one behind a barrier. This would include many of your birds, rabbits, rodents, etc.
7. " This has several chambers (which serve different
purposes) and tunnels connecting these up; due to the design, some are on show and some aren’t. Keepers can’t access some..."
This is a huge red flag! A keeper not being able to reach an animal is really poorly designed. Within a week of that exhibit opening, I can guarantee that the keepers will have dug up that area and redesigned it in case they need to get to a sick or injured (or dead) animal.
8. The immediate thing I have to ask about this exhibit (which, heavens know is why I'm saving it for #8...) is, why should this exhibit be built? What is the justification for a zoo to spend a good deal of money on these backyard animals? This is a personal taste (and one where no points were lost). There's no "wow" element to the exhibit. There's no megafauna, there's no incredible experience, there's no overriding conservation message/effort, in essence, there's nothing that would keep an average zoo visitor coming back to this zoo. I think, if themed properly, this area could work as a children's zoo with appropriate play areas, demonstrations, animal experiences etc.
51/100
Animal Needs 0-20 8
Visitor Needs 0-20 12
Write-up 0-20 18
Landscaping 0-10 2
Interpretation 0-10 5
51
1. Excellent write up. It could benefit from standardized formatting.
2. It is impossible to gauge how bog or small exhibits are. You mention measurements in the write-up but these no not transfer over to the design.
3. You design itself isn't really a design. It's a vague layout that one might see on a zoo map. It's impossible to tell what's what on the map. There are numbers floating in the air with nothing attached to them.
4. Many of the exhibits are far too small. The raptor aviaries for instance. The biggest aviary is 9 meters long, which I would hope holds the largest bird there the Golden Eagle. The eagle has a 2.5 meter wingspan. The bird will barely be able to move. Same with your wildcat enclosures. A 2 meter square enclose for a cat is almost cruel. That's the size of a large transport crate.
5. Roe dear can easily jump the fence in the area where I have to assume the exhibit is.
6. You have a lot of common native species. For interpretation and ecological reasons, might it be better to have an area where wild animals can come in to the zoo? Bird feeders, naturally planted areas, etc. and have those areas with signs/guides pointing out what might be seen. The rarer chance of seeing a wild animal in a zoo is far more rewarding that seeing one behind a barrier. This would include many of your birds, rabbits, rodents, etc.
7. " This has several chambers (which serve different
purposes) and tunnels connecting these up; due to the design, some are on show and some aren’t. Keepers can’t access some..."
This is a huge red flag! A keeper not being able to reach an animal is really poorly designed. Within a week of that exhibit opening, I can guarantee that the keepers will have dug up that area and redesigned it in case they need to get to a sick or injured (or dead) animal.
8. The immediate thing I have to ask about this exhibit (which, heavens know is why I'm saving it for #8...) is, why should this exhibit be built? What is the justification for a zoo to spend a good deal of money on these backyard animals? This is a personal taste (and one where no points were lost). There's no "wow" element to the exhibit. There's no megafauna, there's no incredible experience, there's no overriding conservation message/effort, in essence, there's nothing that would keep an average zoo visitor coming back to this zoo. I think, if themed properly, this area could work as a children's zoo with appropriate play areas, demonstrations, animal experiences etc.
51/100