Zoological inaccuracies & mistakes

Again, hardly any kids know what a Xenurus is. And it's now an old name for what is now Cabassous. And, most integrally, STL didn't have naked-tailed armadillos in 2007. [And doesn't today, either. And most likely did not in the intervening time between the footage being filmed and the present day.]
Coming back to this topic…
I imagine that X-Ray tetra would be a rather easy animal for the STL Zoo to keep - it’s simply that they didn’t have any in the early 21st century.
I believe I may have seen some X-Ray Tetra in the past possibly at London … though oddly enough I have never seen a tank full of them. As nice that would be to see…
 
I went to the Denver Zoo the other day and they incorrectly signed the habitat of the Giant Waxy Tree Frog (Phyllomedusa bicolor) as the “jungle streams of New Guinea.” The species is native to the Amazon Rainforest
 
The most annoying clickbaity article ever.
https://a-z-animals.com/blog/did-we-just-see-this-bird-for-the-last-time-ever/
It talks about the death of a black-necked stork at Zoo Miami, which was granted over 50 years of age..if the article is to be believed. The article itself is about as cohesive as I expect from this website.....which doesn't say much in itself.
But then the article implies that the black-necked stork is in critical danger of extinction - 'almost extinct'.
....and then in the last paragraph of the article it makes a point about how they inch closer to extinction as each living stork dies. Which I guess would be a point worth making if there was some sort of egg disease or something going on.... but nah.. the species in question is near threatened - the point above being much of an every 60 seconds in Africa, a minute passes sort of thing.
Though I will say that the animal in question may well have been the last one in North America ... so maybe that's how this malformed article came to be.
 
I was watching one of those stupid videos about "Animals that asked for help and kindness" which are extremely stupid because they portray animals in a way they shouldn't- like humans, which irritates me and anthromorphisizes animals. What was quite funny in the video is there was one of the animals was a bobcat stuck in some kind of trap, but the person talking in the background of the video (I'm not even sure if it was a real person or an AI voice) called it a civet. I have no clue how they managed to call a bobcat a civet.
 
I was watching one of those stupid videos about "Animals that asked for help and kindness" which are extremely stupid because they portray animals in a way they shouldn't- like humans, which irritates me and anthromorphisizes animals. What was quite funny in the video is there was one of the animals was a bobcat stuck in some kind of trap, but the person talking in the background of the video (I'm not even sure if it was a real person or an AI voice) called it a civet. I have no clue how they managed to call a bobcat a civet.
Yep, these annoy me so much too. I have seen on numerous occasions seen such videos captioned "selfless young bird helps feed elderly bird that can't fly anymore" - the "elderly" bird is a cuckoo chick :rolleyes:

A strange one I've seen is a video of someone finding a dead parrotfish washed up on a beach, and cutting open it's stomach to "discover" that it is full of fake pearls and plastic imitation gemstones. How people can fall for this BS is beyond me.

And if I had a dollar for every time I've seen a video about deep sea creatures and they include axolotls........
 
From an encyclopaedia I had as a child
upload_2023-10-18_23-10-14.png
I suppose it mentions Pygmy hippos in the wording.. but it isn't specific to what is shown in the picture
upload_2023-10-18_23-13-20.png
Not a two-toed sloth...
 

Attachments

  • upload_2023-10-18_23-10-14.png
    upload_2023-10-18_23-10-14.png
    438.1 KB · Views: 105
  • upload_2023-10-18_23-13-20.png
    upload_2023-10-18_23-13-20.png
    94.1 KB · Views: 104
No, it was a book published as the ‘Kingfisher Animal Encyclopaedia’ at one point, though the contents themselves were written earlier than that
Must just be the style. It reminds me of the Marshall Cavendish set which is from 1969 and which I just saw a price for on Google of US$250.
 
From an encyclopaedia I had as a child
View attachment 663695
I suppose it mentions Pygmy hippos in the wording.. but it isn't specific to what is shown in the picture
View attachment 663696
Not a two-toed sloth...

I think I may have had that book as a child as well - if I recall correctly, the picture accompanying the gorilla section was this photo of London Zoo's 'Guy' eating a coconut.
https://www.zoochat.com/community/media/guy-the-gorilla-at-london-zoo.30536/
 
Back
Top