Visited Beauval for the first time last week. I found it a pleasant zoo with an impressive collection and some nice enclosures. I particularly liked the enclosures for cheetah and wolves, as well as for the devils and the lemurs at the entrance with access to fully grown live trees (at least 20m high). And the bird show! What a phantasmagoric experience! The hippo aviary I found an excellent concept that works really well for the visitor, though its implementation has too much of a theme park flavor for my tastes (as does the entire zoo). The African and Asian multi-species savanna enclosures are nice. The new tropical dome is architecturally beautiful housing a multitude of interesting and rare species in conventional enclosures. Beyond that, there is a sheer endless number of enclosures that range from substandard to above average, including some (imo) fumbled mega projects such as 'la terre des lions' (not bad, with lots of imaginative viewing opportunities, but overall aesthetically challenging and underwhelming), the giant pandas, as well as (imo) the tropical dome.
The major weaknesses of the zoo from a visitor point of view, I find a lack of shade, cheap and unconvincing mock rock, mock wood, etc., but most of all: poor planning of visitor views into enclosures. Far too often, viewing of animals would be hampered by thick wire mesh or unshaded glass panels with strong reflections that sometimes almost completely impede viewing (this was particularly acute in the tropical dome). Furthermore, visitors frequently view animals from the top down, which often bereaves the animals of their magic (e.g. snow leopards, malayan tapirs, okapi, brown bears). Also, Beauval often indulges in cross-viewing - something I am not particularly fond of either. I cannot give a qualified comment on husbandry, but it often seemed adequate or good, though often enough also substandard. This appears mostly due to a 'speciouse' curation strategy with lots of small, sometimes cramped enclosures dotted throughout the park in between the larger ones, most notably countless smallish monkey cages and aviaries for all kinds of birds. Finally, there are many enclosures with un-naturalistic (ugly) and functional enclosure design (e.g. koalas, tree kangaroos, giant pandas, many/most monkeys, many vivaria, many aviaries - esp. those indoors). Too often, one will simply look at the animals, but not feel any inclination to linger and observe. In hindsight, the fact that all their promotional material does not include a single picture of one of their enclosures but instead uses images of animals photoshopped into natural environments should have hinted at these shortcomings. Where the zoo fell short, it reminded me a lot of the current London zoo, where it worked well, it reminded me of Prague, Berlin, or Singapore.
Beauval clearly has the resources for expensive and ambitious large-scale projects, as well as innovative ideas. Unfortunately, I found many of these falling far short of their potential due to the above mentioned reasons. For Beauval, I think, further improvement is not a question of money, but of putting their money to better effect through better exhibit design. The enclosures I liked most - the cheetah and the wolves - certainly weren't the most expensive in the zoo. Perhaps they should look to zoos like Vienna, Singapore, San Diego, Zurich, Prague, or Berlin for inspiration.