Hopefully his halfbother Thisiam will be given a chance to breed in the not so distant future...
I've been thinking about that, as it's been mentioned before (and not only here)
now, first, I'm not an "elephant man" and don't keep any records of them.
So if I'm wrong somewhere, feel free to correct me.
I'm sorry too for what happened to sammy. I know how it choqued his keepers. But everyone seems to emphasise on the how important the bloodline is and that there are only 3 (1 bul, 2 females?) alive to continue it.
between the lines, I understand that this means that more animals of this line have died than those 3 that survived.
couldn't this mean that it's a "weak" bloodline and maybe better not to continue it?
Take sammy too: he's 17-18 years old and goes from beautiful animal (no denying that) to sick and then dead in only 2 days! (I also understand he had a serious health problem a few years ago).
I've kept and bred a variety of animals: from shrimps, over fish and reptiles to small mammals. and in my experience there is such a thing as "bad genes". animals that seem right at first sight (even upon veterinary check) but still eat poorly, are often sick, have a lot of dead young, ...
I think this is something that isn't taken in to account enough when it comes to captive animals. Again, what happened to sammy, is a sad story and I understand most of the reactions. But given his "roots", maybe it's not so unexpected at all.
(that is of course unless someone here provides me with a sh**load of info on just how few offspring Siam has had, how those very few unlucky ones died and how healthy and strong the survivors seem)