Wait, weren't the owners the ones that wanted the bigger portion of the revenue? As far as I know the players already had the larger portion before the lockout. I can't remember what the players wanted.
If you don't like your roster than I would be more than happy if the Lakers took Lamar back. He is my favorite player, and I couldn't believe when he got traded to Dallas...
Wait, weren't the owners the ones that wanted the bigger portion of the revenue? As far as I know the players already had the larger portion before the lockout. I can't remember what the players wanted.
If you don't like your roster than I would be more than happy if the Lakers took Lamar back. He is my favorite player, and I couldn't believe when he got traded to Dallas...
Originally, meaning in the previous contract, yes, players had at least a 57% revenue split. The owners wanted 50-53 at one point, and the players wouldn't accept it. Sure, it's not 57%, but at least you're getting half! So much time was wasted fighting over 1 measly percent...
Oh, Lamar is a fantastic addition! But along with Terry and Delonte West, they're the only 3 good bench players we've got. We could be a bit better defensively. Brendan Haywood isn't even that good of a center, I wish we had Chandler back... Then, who's our back-up center? Ian Mahinmi. Now, who is that? (Of course I know who it is, just saying he isn't really "big" in the NBA )
