Do you really believe hunting has caused all of those evolutions?
Bipedal stance did not evolve solely from hunting. Chimpanzees hunt-they don't stand bipedally. Evidence points to bipedal stance evolving from a need to carry-not particularly carcasses.
Binocular vision has nothing to do with hunting. Our vision evolved from the need to judge distances when we were arboreal organisms. Gorillas have binocular vision as well, my friend.
Opposable thumbs don't have anything to do with hunting either. Nearly every species of primate has opposable thumbs (with the exception being the gibbons, who lack useful thumbs because of their brachiating habits) Few are hunters.
Large brains? First of all, we don't have large brains. Brain size has little to do with what I think you mean-intelligence. We could argue this forever, but I don't think that you can prove that carnivorous or omnivorous species are more intelligent than herbivorous species.
If we evolved to be hunters, than why have some human populations-particularly those of the Indian subcontinent-lived vegetarian or flexitarian for generations?
Lastly, poaching or hunting, both forms aim for the strongest or fittest animals, thus decreasing the health of the species.
Best wishes, TV